Gideon Lukens
banner
gidlukens.bsky.social
Gideon Lukens
@gidlukens.bsky.social
Senior Fellow and Director of Research, Health Policy @centeronbudget. Former Dep. Director for Economic Policy at OMB. Music lover. Views expressed are my own.
#ACA marketplace enrollees are real people – not phantoms. Policymakers should not let false arguments get in the way of extending the premium tax credit enhancements to prevent people’s premiums from spiking and allow them to stay covered.
December 2, 2025 at 5:28 PM
While insurance broker fraud is real, the federal government has already taken steps to curtail bad actors. Targeted solutions protect people from improper conduct without raising their premiums or causing them to lose coverage. tinyurl.com/2zzfx5yv
CMS Update on Actions to Prevent Unauthorized Agent and Broker Marketplace Activity | CMS
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) continues to exercise its full statutory and regulatory authority to protect the integrity of the Federally-facilitated Marketplaces (FFMs), which in...
tinyurl.com
December 2, 2025 at 5:28 PM
And allowing premium tax credit enhancements to expire would raise premium costs for over 20 million people and cause 3.8 million to become uninsured. tinyurl.com/zndd97k7
Health Insurance Premium Spikes Imminent as Tax Credit Enhancements Set to Expire
If Congress waits until the end of the year to extend the enhancements, 1.5 million more people will be uninsured in 2026 compared to an earlier extension.
tinyurl.com
December 2, 2025 at 5:28 PM
Disallowing marketplace plans from offering $0 premium options or requiring people to make minimum premium payments could cause roughly a million people to lose marketplace coverage due to additional red tape, researchers estimate. tinyurl.com/2wkzmexn
How would eliminating $0 Marketplace premiums affect insurance coverage? | Brookings
tinyurl.com
December 2, 2025 at 5:27 PM
And the ACA includes a backstop: if insurers take in too much in premiums compared to what they pay out for health care services, the money has to go back to consumers.
December 2, 2025 at 5:27 PM
More enrollees without claims also doesn’t mean more money for insurance companies: if enrollment goes up but there are no additional claims, the cost per enrollee goes down. That means the premium per enrollee – and the federal cost per enrollee – also goes down.
December 2, 2025 at 5:27 PM
The prevalence of enrollees without claims increased in recent years, but that’s because enhancements to premium tax credits pulled in people who use less medical care – because they’re enrolled for shorter periods & because they’re younger and healthier. tinyurl.com/5t2kd9y4
Covered California’s Data Tells A Fuller Story About ACA Marketplace Utilization | Health Affairs Forefront
Based on data from Covered California, we reject the characterization of ACA marketplace enrollees with no claims history as “phantom enrollees.”
tinyurl.com
December 2, 2025 at 5:27 PM
The existence of ppl w/out claims is a normal feature of all health & other insurance markets– not evidence of fraud, & certainly not evidence that enrollees are “phantoms.” Ppl can’t always predict when they’ll need to use their insurance, but it’s meant to be there when they do.
December 2, 2025 at 5:26 PM
The context is that HSAs are currently being touted by some as an alternative to extending the premium tax credit enhancements.
November 11, 2025 at 6:03 PM
HSAs are projected to cost $181B over 10 yrs. That amount would cover - and be better spent - extending the enhanced premium tax credits for ~6 yrs or closing the Medicaid coverage gap for ~9 years. Govt resources are limited, and HSAs have very little bang for the buck in improving affordability.
November 11, 2025 at 6:00 PM
A better way would be to extend ACA marketplace premium tax credit enhancements. See table 2 for estimates for every state: www.cbpp.org/research/hea...
November 11, 2025 at 4:48 PM