It is not yet equivalent to Pinochet’s regime—but it is on the continuum toward authoritarian, extrajudicial behavior, and a clear warning sign of democratic erosion. 6/6

• And could be legally categorized as a de facto disappearance, especially if the person is rendered to danger or a black hole of accountability. 5/6

Conclusion: A Step Toward Extrajudicial Practices

Yes, defying a Supreme Court order to return a deported individual denied due process is a dangerous escalation. It:
• Undermines the judiciary,
• Violates human rights norms,
• Represents executive overreach, 4/6

The parallel here is not in scale but in methodology and intent:
• Labeling someone a threat to justify state action without evidence,
• Using state power to remove them while avoiding oversight,
• Flouting legal or judicial restraint. 3/6

Historical Parallels: Pinochet and Disappearances

Under Pinochet, individuals were:
• Taken without legal process (often accused of being “communists” or “terrorists”),
• Denied any judicial hearing,
• Secretly detained, tortured, or executed,
• And their families got no information. 2/6

Good reason to actually visit a third world country if you can afford to.