www.jrf.org.uk/cost-of-livi...
www.jrf.org.uk/cost-of-livi...
GBE must be given the capabilities and the funding to ultimately become a systemic public player in the UK energy system
GBE must be given the capabilities and the funding to ultimately become a systemic public player in the UK energy system
The UK economy continues on track for disinflation. Inflation is not an immediate cause for concern for the economy, but weaker-than-expected growth is
To boost growth, investment and prosperity, interest rates must come down
The UK economy continues on track for disinflation. Inflation is not an immediate cause for concern for the economy, but weaker-than-expected growth is
To boost growth, investment and prosperity, interest rates must come down
"progressive[s]... must take identity, emotion, and story much more seriously"
"Progressive[s]... will need to better identify and make clear for people the culprits fueling our discontents. Stories without villains make no sense to anyone."
"progressive[s]... must take identity, emotion, and story much more seriously"
"Progressive[s]... will need to better identify and make clear for people the culprits fueling our discontents. Stories without villains make no sense to anyone."
As @ipprnorth.bsky.social have shown, on GDHI per person, the UK has the most unequal living standards in the OECD
As @ipprnorth.bsky.social have shown, on GDHI per person, the UK has the most unequal living standards in the OECD
Bidenomics was layered on top of a growing economy, approaching pre-pandemic GDP, with growing wages
Even before the pandemic the UKs GDP&real wages were *far* worse
Bidenomics was layered on top of a growing economy, approaching pre-pandemic GDP, with growing wages
Even before the pandemic the UKs GDP&real wages were *far* worse
Theresa May & Greg Clark didn't need Biden's cover for the 2017 industrial strategy, nor did Mandelson in the 2010 manifesto, or Miliband in 2015
Just ask Korea in 70s!
Theresa May & Greg Clark didn't need Biden's cover for the 2017 industrial strategy, nor did Mandelson in the 2010 manifesto, or Miliband in 2015
Just ask Korea in 70s!
Was the IRA an inspiration? For IPPR & others, in its ambition, yes
In substance? No, wrong tools and Ind Strat existed before IRA!
Was the IRA an inspiration? For IPPR & others, in its ambition, yes
In substance? No, wrong tools and Ind Strat existed before IRA!
#Budget24 now sees public investment in Britain approaching the average for the rest of the G7
#Budget24 now sees public investment in Britain approaching the average for the rest of the G7
This is a major revision in investment plans between the Labour Manifesto and now
This is a major revision in investment plans between the Labour Manifesto and now
Its a bit weird that this one thing has become so totemic of the fall of IS, but its good to have it back. I'd probably prefer to see more in remit holding gov to account if it is to really safeguard longtermism, but a good statement of intent
Its a bit weird that this one thing has become so totemic of the fall of IS, but its good to have it back. I'd probably prefer to see more in remit holding gov to account if it is to really safeguard longtermism, but a good statement of intent
Shoutout to the excellent work of @ipprnorth.bsky.social &
@ipprscotland.bsky.social here who will no doubt be pleased to see this
The GP recognises the need to boost growth outside London & SE - this is both an economic and a political imperative- and talks of supporting clusters in places
Shoutout to the excellent work of @ipprnorth.bsky.social &
@ipprscotland.bsky.social here who will no doubt be pleased to see this
The GP recognises the need to boost growth outside London & SE - this is both an economic and a political imperative- and talks of supporting clusters in places
A lot of the coverage today seems to have focussed on the CMA and competition for some reason
The answer is easy: monopolies have no interest in investing or innovating so a pro-growth regime is one that *robustly* supports competition
A lot of the coverage today seems to have focussed on the CMA and competition for some reason
The answer is easy: monopolies have no interest in investing or innovating so a pro-growth regime is one that *robustly* supports competition
OK how does this become a reality? The GP sets out a toolkit that is broad but also broadly right. IS should align every tool at govs disposal
Headlines below but other levers mentioned include: R&D,data,planning,transport,regulation,capital,tax,procurement,trade
OK how does this become a reality? The GP sets out a toolkit that is broad but also broadly right. IS should align every tool at govs disposal
Headlines below but other levers mentioned include: R&D,data,planning,transport,regulation,capital,tax,procurement,trade
Much ink has been spilt over this but the green paper comes down on the right side: you dont have to pick, the UK is good at both, we need both in the future
In a welcome move, this shifts the debate away from manufacturing- or AI-fetishism
Much ink has been spilt over this but the green paper comes down on the right side: you dont have to pick, the UK is good at both, we need both in the future
In a welcome move, this shifts the debate away from manufacturing- or AI-fetishism
One of the main things I want to see from an IS is not an economywide plan but strategic prioritisation, it has to say what the UK thinks itll be good at in the future
Like them or not, this strategy has priority sectors and data for why those:
One of the main things I want to see from an IS is not an economywide plan but strategic prioritisation, it has to say what the UK thinks itll be good at in the future
Like them or not, this strategy has priority sectors and data for why those:
A big tension within an IS will be the balance between protecting the jobs & specialisms that exist today and the need to foster future strengths - IMO the latter should be the priority of an IS but the former as an important part - both are here:
A big tension within an IS will be the balance between protecting the jobs & specialisms that exist today and the need to foster future strengths - IMO the latter should be the priority of an IS but the former as an important part - both are here:
Industrial policies shift economic activity, industrial strategy does that in line with a wider objective or goal in mind
The green paper has 4 objectives that @ippr.bsky.social has backed:
📈economic growth
🍃net zero
🗺️regional growth
🌐economic security
Industrial policies shift economic activity, industrial strategy does that in line with a wider objective or goal in mind
The green paper has 4 objectives that @ippr.bsky.social has backed:
📈economic growth
🍃net zero
🗺️regional growth
🌐economic security
IS is not about state planning or subsidy races or picking winners - its about a strategic state as an active participant in the economy, with embedded institutional capacity, working to prioritise and coordinate
IS is not about state planning or subsidy races or picking winners - its about a strategic state as an active participant in the economy, with embedded institutional capacity, working to prioritise and coordinate
Industrial strategy is *not* the entirety of a growth strategy, if you want something to solve every problem in the economy you're in the wrong place. This is one intervention among many needed for growth
Industrial strategy is *not* the entirety of a growth strategy, if you want something to solve every problem in the economy you're in the wrong place. This is one intervention among many needed for growth
🇬🇧The publication of the Green Paper is an important first step to securing long-term green growth for the UK: gov.uk/government/c...
👇A few thoughts on its content below
🇬🇧The publication of the Green Paper is an important first step to securing long-term green growth for the UK: gov.uk/government/c...
👇A few thoughts on its content below