People may go "well actually, it's not just X that does it" miss the point because Zuckerberg isn't smugly tweeting emojis in response to requests to rein it in

I think he and many like him just find agreeing with the bullies on every single issue is now their bread and butter for engagement.

They've massed a new audience that will react with hostility if they question their cult leader.

Interesting thing is that even people like JK Rowling defended it.

Fellas, is it woke to not shoot unarmed mothers now?

Anti war to them is also thaylt nothing is ever Russia's fault.

Totally agree, I've just recently remade my account on here and trying to find again the GC accounts I used to follow that were very insightful and had many things that I agreed with. If you're on X now, it's because you like all the vile shit as well.

If you still use that site when it's got tools like that, then you're just enabling it.

There are still plenty social media sites you can use that allow opposing views.

Personally, I think if you're ow X, then you're just enabling all of it.

There are many accounts here with opposing views, including trans issues, none of of them are sticking up for ai child porn.

Funnily enough, years ago, just after 9/11, there was a show on British TV that did comedy sketches, and one of the sketches was Harry Potter bombing Afghanistan.

Seems appropriate in a strange way.

I'm assuming that's down to not wanting to upset their new fans? Even if amyone agree it's wrong.

Oh, right, I thought "officers" had to do it.

I wasn't seeing things, was I? He pulls out the gun when the car is moving away from him?

Im British and not versed in gun laws, but are they deliberately overlooking that the murderer never even had his gun drawn so they can't even argue that he gave warning before hand?

That game takes me back!