This is exactly why my multiexposure of the eclipse last night still had an overlap — since I had completely neglected lunar motion around Earth in a 128 sec gap estimate. Mun moves on orbit 3% the length of its body-dia in the meantime. Andrew's pic is brilliant, just wonder why shadow static(?)

Or /iow: waiting longer btw the Moon shots makes the disk 'move' further to the up right b/c camera on Earth has rotated further (24h/day), but at the same time the Mun also had a slight shift to the left on its 28d-journey around Earth. Hence, relative rotation appears 3-4% slower than 2π/24h. 2/2

Nerd-fact: I had roughly estimated from lunar diameter, distance, +Earth rotation that 130s would be just enough to get clear lunar 'disks':
128s=atan(dia/dist)/(2π/24h).
But I neglected lunar counter rotation around Earth, which adds a few seconds to the bill. That's why the disks overlap a bit 1/2

So you are saying the enforced d(TWS)/dt — instead of ET + Q — temporarily balances a grand part of the P? 🤭
(rather runoff/surface flow than Q...)

This work contains work from #globalCDA and is a collaboration with WWF @wwf.eu

Good job.

Officially yes :-|
But I can still load projects 🤷

Do the groundtracks include model dynamics, d(mean anomaly)/dt, or are they based on the latest TLE? (Rhetorical Q: would we see the difference on such a map?)