Gregory Pearson
gdnpearson.bsky.social
Gregory Pearson
@gdnpearson.bsky.social
Radiologist 🩻. Cyclist 🚴‍♀️. MD/PhD. Looking for all the people I used to follow on Twitter. Need real followers. Will follow back if you have something interesting to say. Slava Ukraini! 🇺🇦

Blocks anyone who replies to posts with crypto ads.
We’re saying Merry Christmas again!*

*even to the traitors, losers and haters who created the Democrat Russia, Russia, Russia hoax and the Epstein hoax and who stole the 2020 election and should be hanged.
December 6, 2025 at 3:07 PM
WTF is a friggin’ soccer federation doing handing out a peace prize in the first place? 🤦🏻
December 5, 2025 at 10:20 PM
Agreed.
December 4, 2025 at 4:11 PM
Following.

The closest I’ve heard is that he refuses to condemn the phrase “globalize the intifada”, although I do not believe he himself has ever used it.

Thus antisemitism by omission.
December 4, 2025 at 4:07 PM
Bring back the Homer!
December 4, 2025 at 1:50 PM
…you’d come up with more cats killed per manual vehicle, given that autonomous vehicles have a much lower accident rate thus far we know of only one cat killed, while manual vehicles kill several per day.

As an aside, people should not keep outdoor cats. They kill 2 billion birds a year in the US.
December 3, 2025 at 12:28 PM
Do not discount how much damage the couchf*cker could do in a lame duck session.
December 3, 2025 at 1:15 AM
That they are scapegoating is obvious. Neither Trump nor Hegseth voiced any concern over the “double tap” strike until after it became a media firestorm. They praised and defended the attack.
December 2, 2025 at 7:33 PM
Every day is grifter day since they excluded the mainstream press (including Fox) that wouldn’t sign their loyalty oath.
December 2, 2025 at 5:12 PM
Wilhoit’s law:

“Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.”
December 2, 2025 at 3:36 PM
We must expose pedophiles but also cover up for pedophiles.
December 2, 2025 at 3:33 PM
I’m sure you have many Stans who need perpling. Don’t we all?
December 2, 2025 at 1:34 PM
Yes. But an MRI could also be ordered if someone had an elevated PSA to look for prostate cancer, of the spine to look for disk disease, of the knee to look for cartilage damage, of the liver to look for dilated bile ducts, of the breasts to look for breast cancer (which guys can get)…and so on.
December 2, 2025 at 1:10 AM
Who doesn’t want a mud room with 2 tubs and a coat bath?
December 1, 2025 at 9:54 PM
Doctor here. Preventative? No. Sometimes used for screening? Yes. You can go to any number of outpatient radiology facilities and pay them cash and they will do a “total body MRI” to look for stuff. Sometimes done as part of an “executive physical”. No reputable medical organization recommends it.
December 1, 2025 at 9:50 PM
They really are, but you can have mixed systems. A government run entity that overlaps/competes with private enterprise. But if governments own the roads or the utilities or the oil companies, that’s socialism

Only in authoritarian/communist systems does the government own all business.
December 1, 2025 at 8:12 PM
Yes, federal land is socialism. That’s why the GOP wants to sell it off. So is the VA hospital system.

In the UK they have NHS, but they also have private hospitals and physicians who don’t participate. You can’t say NHS isn’t socialized medicine just because they compete.
December 1, 2025 at 8:04 PM
Government ownership of the means of businesses is by definition socialism. One could make the same argument about subsidized subways and free busses: government funded services which compete with private enterprise (cabs and ride share).
December 1, 2025 at 6:38 PM
Does government owned grocery stores count?
December 1, 2025 at 6:25 PM
A friend of mine who is a law professor described executive orders as “tweets on better paper”.

But I agree. If you don’t like DACA, rescind DACA, don’t just ignore it.
November 29, 2025 at 5:49 PM
Was DACA ever a law? O thought it was done by executive order because Congress wouldn’t pass a law.
November 29, 2025 at 4:55 PM