Alfonso T. García-Sosa, PhD
@garciasosa.bsky.social
🇲🇽Assoc. Prof. @UniTartu | Fmr. Postdoc @MayoClinic | PhD @Cambridge_Uni | BSc @Quimica_UNAM | Senior Lead, Data Science @Proekspert
Machine Learning, AI, Molecular Design, Biomolecular modeling,
https://hermes.chem.ut.ee/~alfx
Machine Learning, AI, Molecular Design, Biomolecular modeling,
https://hermes.chem.ut.ee/~alfx
Reposted by Alfonso T. García-Sosa, PhD
Different rules of the game would have radically changed history.
Our counterfactual simulations show that without colonial transfers, Europe would have been a debtor — and South Asia or Latin America could have become global creditors.
[5/8]
Our counterfactual simulations show that without colonial transfers, Europe would have been a debtor — and South Asia or Latin America could have become global creditors.
[5/8]
June 9, 2025 at 1:37 PM
Different rules of the game would have radically changed history.
Our counterfactual simulations show that without colonial transfers, Europe would have been a debtor — and South Asia or Latin America could have become global creditors.
[5/8]
Our counterfactual simulations show that without colonial transfers, Europe would have been a debtor — and South Asia or Latin America could have become global creditors.
[5/8]
By that standard, most of the world’s leaders, western and European governments and media and academia fail even worse
April 22, 2025 at 6:36 AM
By that standard, most of the world’s leaders, western and European governments and media and academia fail even worse
Even if that were the case, making the human trials more risky would have a negative effect since I would imagine it would be more expensive and harder to get backing to launch one. Human trials are the bottleneck. Better to improve the success rate of these even if it means more animal testing
April 15, 2025 at 5:37 AM
Even if that were the case, making the human trials more risky would have a negative effect since I would imagine it would be more expensive and harder to get backing to launch one. Human trials are the bottleneck. Better to improve the success rate of these even if it means more animal testing
I agree it would be a good thing. But it would need to be very well described, even maybe more so than the main text, for it to increase the value of the information of what didn't work, or what would need tweaking for it to work.
April 14, 2025 at 10:45 AM
I agree it would be a good thing. But it would need to be very well described, even maybe more so than the main text, for it to increase the value of the information of what didn't work, or what would need tweaking for it to work.