Gaius/Alk
@gaiusalkibiades.bsky.social
Student, Communist, Stereotype.
Napoleonic enthusiast
Napoleonic enthusiast
Its gonna carry ICBMs for a nuclear strike role. What exact ICBMs nobody knows but if the tubes are slanted SK experts theorize it could carry the largest solid fuel land based ones they got. I expect a large solid stage submarine specific model though
December 31, 2025 at 11:54 PM
Its gonna carry ICBMs for a nuclear strike role. What exact ICBMs nobody knows but if the tubes are slanted SK experts theorize it could carry the largest solid fuel land based ones they got. I expect a large solid stage submarine specific model though
Almost certainly cope. Nuclear powers would be visibly flipping out if a “gun runner” boat was actually shipping illicit nuclear tech around.
December 31, 2025 at 11:51 PM
Almost certainly cope. Nuclear powers would be visibly flipping out if a “gun runner” boat was actually shipping illicit nuclear tech around.
Nah it’s new the big sail is a feature of older Russian Chinese and even American boats. It’s pretty typical for your first SSBN cause it means you can have a smaller pressure hull carrying bigger missiles
December 31, 2025 at 11:48 PM
Nah it’s new the big sail is a feature of older Russian Chinese and even American boats. It’s pretty typical for your first SSBN cause it means you can have a smaller pressure hull carrying bigger missiles
Small pressure haul=easier and cheaper construction
To make the pressure hull tall enough for the missiles requires a much more massive sub
To make the pressure hull tall enough for the missiles requires a much more massive sub
December 28, 2025 at 3:02 AM
Small pressure haul=easier and cheaper construction
To make the pressure hull tall enough for the missiles requires a much more massive sub
To make the pressure hull tall enough for the missiles requires a much more massive sub
About to nock out the two chapters.
March 16, 2025 at 7:56 PM
About to nock out the two chapters.
I have read a couple of their shorter articles. I find them better than Dauve but with weird tangents or leaps that sometimes makes me balk.
March 15, 2025 at 1:43 PM
I have read a couple of their shorter articles. I find them better than Dauve but with weird tangents or leaps that sometimes makes me balk.
Beyond parody. What an idiot.
March 13, 2025 at 8:27 PM
Beyond parody. What an idiot.
“Dogmatist” as if that’s an insult. I am the only one who has provided a justification for my position. That for Marxism the collapse of the USSR discredits Stalin. Not beliefs). I cited my sources. You just spouted shit with no basis. You have no idea what you are talking about.
March 13, 2025 at 6:52 PM
“Dogmatist” as if that’s an insult. I am the only one who has provided a justification for my position. That for Marxism the collapse of the USSR discredits Stalin. Not beliefs). I cited my sources. You just spouted shit with no basis. You have no idea what you are talking about.
You people will do anything but actually read Marx and read Capital. Allergic to it.
March 13, 2025 at 6:38 PM
You people will do anything but actually read Marx and read Capital. Allergic to it.
My whole point is that their isn’t a conversation. The whole historical debate about the USSR is a joke settled in 1950 and confirmed in 1991. It exists now as only as bourgeoise ideological screen
March 13, 2025 at 6:37 PM
My whole point is that their isn’t a conversation. The whole historical debate about the USSR is a joke settled in 1950 and confirmed in 1991. It exists now as only as bourgeoise ideological screen
I have literally quoted snippets of Marx and Engels this entire time. And linked several sources. You are the one talking about shit you know nothing about. Because you haven’t read Marx or Engels.
March 13, 2025 at 6:36 PM
I have literally quoted snippets of Marx and Engels this entire time. And linked several sources. You are the one talking about shit you know nothing about. Because you haven’t read Marx or Engels.
Platonic idealism is when you get immersed in a bunch of metaphysical nonsense instead of the real concrete analysis that is Marx’s analysis of capitalism.
March 13, 2025 at 6:30 PM
Platonic idealism is when you get immersed in a bunch of metaphysical nonsense instead of the real concrete analysis that is Marx’s analysis of capitalism.
It’s hard to regurgitate the entirety of scientific arguments in tweets. Excuse me for telling you to actually read things and citing my sources. What a zealot I am.
March 13, 2025 at 6:28 PM
It’s hard to regurgitate the entirety of scientific arguments in tweets. Excuse me for telling you to actually read things and citing my sources. What a zealot I am.
Accuses me of idealism. Whips out platonic idealism.
What not reading Capital does to ur brain
What not reading Capital does to ur brain
March 13, 2025 at 6:19 PM
Accuses me of idealism. Whips out platonic idealism.
What not reading Capital does to ur brain
What not reading Capital does to ur brain
Yes it is. It is the generalized system of commodity production wage labor and private property. Read Capital lol
March 13, 2025 at 5:43 PM
Yes it is. It is the generalized system of commodity production wage labor and private property. Read Capital lol
Socialism doesn’t care about capitalist indicators of growth. The abolition of money and commodity production. the abolition of exchange. It removed the very foundations of the capitalist economy.
March 13, 2025 at 5:35 PM
Socialism doesn’t care about capitalist indicators of growth. The abolition of money and commodity production. the abolition of exchange. It removed the very foundations of the capitalist economy.
Capitalism can “manage” capitalist production. But it has become a fetter on production generally. A burden. It has been a burden for over 100 years. When socialism snaps these fetters and burst these bonds production cannot be forced back into them. Not without destruction unprecedented.
March 13, 2025 at 5:32 PM
Capitalism can “manage” capitalist production. But it has become a fetter on production generally. A burden. It has been a burden for over 100 years. When socialism snaps these fetters and burst these bonds production cannot be forced back into them. Not without destruction unprecedented.
How do you do that? You cannot do that without destroying production itself!!
The difference between the feudal serf/free peasant and the modern citizen prol. Is smaller than the difference between the modern prol and the species man of socialism.
The difference between the feudal serf/free peasant and the modern citizen prol. Is smaller than the difference between the modern prol and the species man of socialism.
March 13, 2025 at 5:05 PM
How do you do that? You cannot do that without destroying production itself!!
The difference between the feudal serf/free peasant and the modern citizen prol. Is smaller than the difference between the modern prol and the species man of socialism.
The difference between the feudal serf/free peasant and the modern citizen prol. Is smaller than the difference between the modern prol and the species man of socialism.
What a meaningless phrase. “Pure”capitalism exists globally. There are pre capitalist vestiges in society. Just as there will be capitalist vestiges of Socialist society. (Read critique of the Gotha program) but that doesn’t change that capitalism is capitalism and socialism socialism.
March 13, 2025 at 5:03 PM
What a meaningless phrase. “Pure”capitalism exists globally. There are pre capitalist vestiges in society. Just as there will be capitalist vestiges of Socialist society. (Read critique of the Gotha program) but that doesn’t change that capitalism is capitalism and socialism socialism.
You are exactly arrogant the equivalent. That’s what going from socialism back to capitalism would be like. If you don’t understand that you understand nothing of what socialism is.
March 13, 2025 at 4:59 PM
You are exactly arrogant the equivalent. That’s what going from socialism back to capitalism would be like. If you don’t understand that you understand nothing of what socialism is.
The closest historical example you get is nomads becoming settled and unsettling. But they always maintain relations with settled peoples. They don’t return to the pure pastoralism of their fathers but a new quasi one dependent on settled peoples
March 13, 2025 at 4:58 PM
The closest historical example you get is nomads becoming settled and unsettling. But they always maintain relations with settled peoples. They don’t return to the pure pastoralism of their fathers but a new quasi one dependent on settled peoples
It’s how old society is destroyed which is important. It is destroyed because it can no longer manage production. Unless that changes it cannot return. And destroying production so it fits into old relations is socially in possible. Nobody is allowing luddites to send everybody back to the Stone Age
March 13, 2025 at 4:57 PM
It’s how old society is destroyed which is important. It is destroyed because it can no longer manage production. Unless that changes it cannot return. And destroying production so it fits into old relations is socially in possible. Nobody is allowing luddites to send everybody back to the Stone Age