Is anything I said actually unclear?

4. While your claim that the Supreme Court judgment covers the toilets-at-work regulations is not strictly inaccurate, it’s nothing more than your opinion, and presenting it as gospel is misleading. The Supreme Court didn’t mention toilets, or that regulation, even once.

3. You’ve not even mentioned the positive action provision of the Equality Act, which is of very, very obvious relevance.

2. There will certainly be no “exact correspondence” when it comes to gender identity beliefs. Many people who are not trans hold gender identity beliefs, and some people who are trans do not hold gender identity beliefs.

What you’ve said is far from accurate.
1. Opening a particular service to people who identify as women isn’t direct sex discrimination as the excluded group will not be solely biological men. Trans men (what you’d call biological women) will also be excluded. So there is no “exact correspondence”.

Appreciated

I’m slightly sceptical that kidnapping someone, killing them and then returning another body in their place can legitimately be described as an ‘honest’ mistake. The scenario only took place because of Hamas’s wrongful acts.

No it isn’t. It isn’t even English.
Go away now and find some other Jew to troll .

Try again but in English this time?

I want you to give an honest account of why you think his ownership of Global is relevant. Can you do that?

OK. And what’s the relevance of the fact that he owns it?
Come on: screw your courage to the sticking-post and speak your mind.

How can you tell from sight who is and isn’t a member of Hamas?

Gosh, you’re quite cowardly aren’t you?

Why don’t you summon up some courage and tell us?