O filme até usa a iconografia de forma legal, mas o meio do filme é horrível, só melhora no final com os últimos 5 minutos parecendo de um filme excelente que na vdd não foi.

Pepe has fantastic art, but honestly I never read this book thinking about that aspect alone, maybe in the future I'll buy ASM again. Good review! I hope you both enjoy the run! 🙏

Shay? not Peter's girlfriend and still a blank page, Peter? Still in the same situation set in stone since 2007

(I risk being contradictory here, because I also want to see this character move forward). Here in Kelly's Spider-Man I see the same issues being "developed" as in the previous run, perhaps without the overly depressing tone of Wells.

My point is that Spencer saw questions in Spider-Man's chronology that needed to be answered, and that were messed up, as well as an initiative to reset Peter to a point where he would be recognizable again to the wider public after years of a deviant change to what the character was

poorly developed characters from the past run here without any weight. Ah, a secret villain just like in the previous two runs, and again Norman Osborn trying to "redeem" himself for past crimes?

I think there's no way to move forward without fixing the "chronology" first, making Peter take responsibility for past decisions and making that the motto of the run worked for Spencer (well, 70% of it), in this #1 of Kelly I can only see meta jokes about "Parkers' luck" and -

If the title becomes less nihilistic and less cynical, it will be a step forward... now as for the treatment of the characters, I hope it improves.

Tá foda mesmo