Gabriel Heyman
@gabrielheyman.bsky.social
Swedish ID physician and germ theory aficionado
Is it like a set of news stories (actual and AI generated) that the respondents categorize as fake or real? As part of your survey?
October 30, 2025 at 4:57 PM
Is it like a set of news stories (actual and AI generated) that the respondents categorize as fake or real? As part of your survey?
Very interesting. How did you measure ”susceptibility to misinformation”?
October 30, 2025 at 4:30 PM
Very interesting. How did you measure ”susceptibility to misinformation”?
Having used an actual virtual boy, what do you think of the ergonomics with the cardboard case with joycons as handles. It almost seems like it would be more comfortable than the original design…
September 12, 2025 at 6:34 PM
Having used an actual virtual boy, what do you think of the ergonomics with the cardboard case with joycons as handles. It almost seems like it would be more comfortable than the original design…
Thank you. That is a AUC 400-600 not taking the MIC 2 into account, yes? We’ve been doing this as well, but can’t find any published data on it and aiming for 400-600 AUC/MIC2 would mean high exposures with trough levels above 20.
June 11, 2025 at 8:18 AM
Thank you. That is a AUC 400-600 not taking the MIC 2 into account, yes? We’ve been doing this as well, but can’t find any published data on it and aiming for 400-600 AUC/MIC2 would mean high exposures with trough levels above 20.
Another question about this most interesting study! Are the MICs available for your isolates, especially the CoNS? Did you include isolates with MIC 2 and if so, where you content with AUC 400 - 600 (not doing AUC/MIC2 calculations?)
June 10, 2025 at 10:31 AM
Another question about this most interesting study! Are the MICs available for your isolates, especially the CoNS? Did you include isolates with MIC 2 and if so, where you content with AUC 400 - 600 (not doing AUC/MIC2 calculations?)
Very interesting! We are using PEN-FAST at our hospital and will for sure be keeping 👀 on SULF-FAST.
May 26, 2025 at 11:26 AM
Very interesting! We are using PEN-FAST at our hospital and will for sure be keeping 👀 on SULF-FAST.
Great! I had heard you guys mentioning something about this in an old episode but wasn’t aware that it was published. Many thanks!
May 26, 2025 at 10:09 AM
Great! I had heard you guys mentioning something about this in an old episode but wasn’t aware that it was published. Many thanks!
Oh I didn’t realize that Mr PEN FAST was on bluesky. What about @trubianojason.bsky.social himself? Is there a clinical support tool for oral challenge in suspected cotrimoxazole allergy? I suspect we have some sub optimal PCP prophylaxis due to old allergy varnings
May 26, 2025 at 7:52 AM
Oh I didn’t realize that Mr PEN FAST was on bluesky. What about @trubianojason.bsky.social himself? Is there a clinical support tool for oral challenge in suspected cotrimoxazole allergy? I suspect we have some sub optimal PCP prophylaxis due to old allergy varnings
Bioavailability of doxy is quite good so I don’t think it would make a difference in most cases.
March 22, 2025 at 9:16 PM
Bioavailability of doxy is quite good so I don’t think it would make a difference in most cases.
Om SKR vill visa ”innovationskraft” kan man få halvera antalet klick i 1177 personalverktyg för att skicka meddelanden till patienten…
Skämt åsido, finns det någon ambition att låta Cosmic-systemen prata med varandra, ens på sikt istället för NPÖ?
Skämt åsido, finns det någon ambition att låta Cosmic-systemen prata med varandra, ens på sikt istället för NPÖ?
February 22, 2025 at 1:38 PM
Om SKR vill visa ”innovationskraft” kan man få halvera antalet klick i 1177 personalverktyg för att skicka meddelanden till patienten…
Skämt åsido, finns det någon ambition att låta Cosmic-systemen prata med varandra, ens på sikt istället för NPÖ?
Skämt åsido, finns det någon ambition att låta Cosmic-systemen prata med varandra, ens på sikt istället för NPÖ?
You wouldn’t do cefepime or meropenem for type I penicillin allergy?
This well researched Dutch guideline changed our practice and there is an excellent Breakpoints episode on the same subject.
www.clinicalmicrobiologyandinfection.com/article/S119...
sidp.pinecast.co/episode/8645...
This well researched Dutch guideline changed our practice and there is an excellent Breakpoints episode on the same subject.
www.clinicalmicrobiologyandinfection.com/article/S119...
sidp.pinecast.co/episode/8645...
February 15, 2025 at 6:01 PM
You wouldn’t do cefepime or meropenem for type I penicillin allergy?
This well researched Dutch guideline changed our practice and there is an excellent Breakpoints episode on the same subject.
www.clinicalmicrobiologyandinfection.com/article/S119...
sidp.pinecast.co/episode/8645...
This well researched Dutch guideline changed our practice and there is an excellent Breakpoints episode on the same subject.
www.clinicalmicrobiologyandinfection.com/article/S119...
sidp.pinecast.co/episode/8645...
What do you mean by non-cost? Using non commercial Bayesian MIPD software?
February 9, 2025 at 9:27 PM
What do you mean by non-cost? Using non commercial Bayesian MIPD software?
Gambling + Disciplin = Äg ett nätcasino som gör reklam i Alex och Sigges podd
January 31, 2025 at 11:28 AM
Gambling + Disciplin = Äg ett nätcasino som gör reklam i Alex och Sigges podd
If you like it then you shoulda put a 📌 on it!
…which I did. It’s on my office wall. Tissue penetration next?
…which I did. It’s on my office wall. Tissue penetration next?
January 27, 2025 at 8:32 AM
If you like it then you shoulda put a 📌 on it!
…which I did. It’s on my office wall. Tissue penetration next?
…which I did. It’s on my office wall. Tissue penetration next?
I found this study very interesting! Am currently looking into introducing an MIPD/AUC workflow at our hospital currently using trough guided dosing.
In the AUC arm in your study, did you mainly use single concentrations at trough time to estimate AUC/MIC in Bayesian software?
In the AUC arm in your study, did you mainly use single concentrations at trough time to estimate AUC/MIC in Bayesian software?
January 18, 2025 at 6:29 PM
I found this study very interesting! Am currently looking into introducing an MIPD/AUC workflow at our hospital currently using trough guided dosing.
In the AUC arm in your study, did you mainly use single concentrations at trough time to estimate AUC/MIC in Bayesian software?
In the AUC arm in your study, did you mainly use single concentrations at trough time to estimate AUC/MIC in Bayesian software?