Looks like an important post, not sure why you'd put it behind a paywall

The moustache is epic mate

Thanks! Bringing VFX to scicomm is going to be more of a thing in 2025

Modern day labor indeed

Glad you liked it!
The full video is available on the studio's website and on YouTube:
youtu.be/UectIvzO_Lg?...

nice image. I wish my institute had similar contests when I was doing my master's.

Instead, they just had science-themed singing contests 🤷

I'm very curious what in your opinion is the reason/explanation for this lack of sanctions?

This attention to detail does something else too – it signals to all audiences that your research communication is thoughtfully crafted, not an afterthought.

When viewers sense this care, they engage more deeply with your science.

Both these effects combine together to largely increase your explainer’s impact on the target audience.

The key to Re-watch value?

Hidden details, subtle references, and carefully crafted backgrounds that reveal new insights with each viewing.

When your audience revisits your explainer video multiple times, it signals to algorithms that your content is worth spreading.

And by rewarding these repeat viewers with carefully crafted details, you're deepening their engagement with your scientific concepts.

Thanks Mario!
Cheers

Love this!

Thanks Shahab, glad you like it!

Yes it's in room temp, ultra-low pressure (but from my understanding, not low enough to be ultra expensive).

RSG's shouldn't be interfering in this approach and they expect to have several dozens of generation + entanglement couples (as shown in this video) on the same tiny chip.

youtu.be/ustVvxJ8t-s?...

Funny, that was the first thing I checked after I joined