Gabi de Bruïne
@gabidb.bsky.social
PhD candidate researching eyewitness memory and credibility assessments in cross-cultural contexts @amslablegpsy.bsky.social | @vucriminologie.bsky.social | Mum of a beautiful rainbow baby 🌈 and fur baby 🐕🖤
Reposted by Gabi de Bruïne
Cultural differences in eyewitness testimony have significant implications for investigative interviewers @gabidb.bsky.social #SARMAC2025
June 12, 2025 at 1:56 PM
Cultural differences in eyewitness testimony have significant implications for investigative interviewers @gabidb.bsky.social #SARMAC2025
(8/8)
📚 Read the full article:
doi.org/10.1080/0965...
#EyewitnessMemory #CrossCulturalResearch #LegalPsychology #CredibilityAssessment #CommunicationStyles
📚 Read the full article:
doi.org/10.1080/0965...
#EyewitnessMemory #CrossCulturalResearch #LegalPsychology #CredibilityAssessment #CommunicationStyles
The way we remember and report: an experiment testing cultural differences in eyewitness memory
More and more people report their memories in cross-cultural contexts, including eyewitness interviews. In a pre-registered experiment (N = 64), we examined cultural differences in mock eyewitness ...
doi.org
May 16, 2025 at 11:49 AM
(8/8)
📚 Read the full article:
doi.org/10.1080/0965...
#EyewitnessMemory #CrossCulturalResearch #LegalPsychology #CredibilityAssessment #CommunicationStyles
📚 Read the full article:
doi.org/10.1080/0965...
#EyewitnessMemory #CrossCulturalResearch #LegalPsychology #CredibilityAssessment #CommunicationStyles
(7/8)
Future research should explore how to better elicit forensically relevant details from individuals with diverse cultural backgrounds, especially in investigative interviews.
Future research should explore how to better elicit forensically relevant details from individuals with diverse cultural backgrounds, especially in investigative interviews.
May 16, 2025 at 11:49 AM
(7/8)
Future research should explore how to better elicit forensically relevant details from individuals with diverse cultural backgrounds, especially in investigative interviews.
Future research should explore how to better elicit forensically relevant details from individuals with diverse cultural backgrounds, especially in investigative interviews.
(6/8)
This matters because detailedness is often used as a proxy for credibility in legal and institutional settings—potentially disadvantaging high-context communicators.
This matters because detailedness is often used as a proxy for credibility in legal and institutional settings—potentially disadvantaging high-context communicators.
May 16, 2025 at 11:49 AM
(6/8)
This matters because detailedness is often used as a proxy for credibility in legal and institutional settings—potentially disadvantaging high-context communicators.
This matters because detailedness is often used as a proxy for credibility in legal and institutional settings—potentially disadvantaging high-context communicators.
(5/8)
These findings reflect differences in communication styles:
🗣️ Western Europeans → low-context (explicit, detail-focused)
🌍 Sub-Saharan Africans → high-context (implicit, meaning-focused)
These findings reflect differences in communication styles:
🗣️ Western Europeans → low-context (explicit, detail-focused)
🌍 Sub-Saharan Africans → high-context (implicit, meaning-focused)
May 16, 2025 at 11:49 AM
(5/8)
These findings reflect differences in communication styles:
🗣️ Western Europeans → low-context (explicit, detail-focused)
🌍 Sub-Saharan Africans → high-context (implicit, meaning-focused)
These findings reflect differences in communication styles:
🗣️ Western Europeans → low-context (explicit, detail-focused)
🌍 Sub-Saharan Africans → high-context (implicit, meaning-focused)
(4/8)
Sub-Saharan African participants included more contextual information, such as moral evaluations and inferences (e.g., interpreting the event as a scam).
Sub-Saharan African participants included more contextual information, such as moral evaluations and inferences (e.g., interpreting the event as a scam).
May 16, 2025 at 11:49 AM
(4/8)
Sub-Saharan African participants included more contextual information, such as moral evaluations and inferences (e.g., interpreting the event as a scam).
Sub-Saharan African participants included more contextual information, such as moral evaluations and inferences (e.g., interpreting the event as a scam).
(3/8)
Despite differences in quantity, there were no significant differences in accuracy between the two groups.
Despite differences in quantity, there were no significant differences in accuracy between the two groups.
May 16, 2025 at 11:49 AM
(3/8)
Despite differences in quantity, there were no significant differences in accuracy between the two groups.
Despite differences in quantity, there were no significant differences in accuracy between the two groups.
(2/8)
Western European participants reported significantly more correct, incorrect, and total details than sub-Saharan African participants.
Western European participants reported significantly more correct, incorrect, and total details than sub-Saharan African participants.
May 16, 2025 at 11:49 AM
(2/8)
Western European participants reported significantly more correct, incorrect, and total details than sub-Saharan African participants.
Western European participants reported significantly more correct, incorrect, and total details than sub-Saharan African participants.