I think it's silly to expect them to take a loss in a situation like this . I could buy that argument in like a natural disaster or something, but why should they subsidize people getting drunk on NYE? It's 100% predictable. Can't afford to pay market rates, don't get drunk. or take a bus.

Yes, and largely about myself.

Uhh not unless it had no flour (or the flour is sterilized before), it is flour, not eggs which is the major risk behind raw dough.

To indicate this stuff is sold, not stolen for personal use.

Literally everything could be solved by ... Solving everything? Yeah

Well, yeah, unfortunately it does not seem like that's the way to go. In fact I have no idea what is.

Yes, no disagreement there. But as long as the problem exists it's best to recognize it for what it is rather then pretend it's something else.

They are addicted to drugs. Which is very sad. But they don't, generally, in the us, need to steal to survive.

The more expensive stuff is either better protected, or harder to sell. priceonomics.com/why-thieves-...

So they can sell it. And get money for drugs. sfstandard.com/2024/11/29/b...