@fromcarl.bsky.social
Excerpt
The state bar … would … use these events as a basis for denying him the right to practice law; it would take a historic California Supreme Court ruling in Siegel v. Committee of Bar Examiners to affirm that participation in protest movements is not a sign of deficient “moral character.”
The state bar … would … use these events as a basis for denying him the right to practice law; it would take a historic California Supreme Court ruling in Siegel v. Committee of Bar Examiners to affirm that participation in protest movements is not a sign of deficient “moral character.”
July 6, 2025 at 4:34 AM
Excerpt
The state bar … would … use these events as a basis for denying him the right to practice law; it would take a historic California Supreme Court ruling in Siegel v. Committee of Bar Examiners to affirm that participation in protest movements is not a sign of deficient “moral character.”
The state bar … would … use these events as a basis for denying him the right to practice law; it would take a historic California Supreme Court ruling in Siegel v. Committee of Bar Examiners to affirm that participation in protest movements is not a sign of deficient “moral character.”