✍️: Montreal Hockey Now
🗣️: Hockey Nation Podcast
Drafting a truculent player that projects as a 4th liner over a middle-6 F would be a mistake.
Take the small talented F now and flip him later to address areas of need
Drafting a truculent player that projects as a 4th liner over a middle-6 F would be a mistake.
Take the small talented F now and flip him later to address areas of need
I.e. I’d be much more onboard with Kindel’s selection than say Daniil Prokhorov, at 16, for the sake of getting bigger
I.e. I’d be much more onboard with Kindel’s selection than say Daniil Prokhorov, at 16, for the sake of getting bigger
While he may never be a power forward, I’m confident the way he plays and attacks will be even more effective once he fills out and puts it together.
While he may never be a power forward, I’m confident the way he plays and attacks will be even more effective once he fills out and puts it together.
There’s a long runway for him to be a top-6 player, and he’s already shown great improvement in other areas - so why not this one?
There’s a long runway for him to be a top-6 player, and he’s already shown great improvement in other areas - so why not this one?
Agreed, Habs will be looking at younger targets, but it may be trickier than expected - they might need a Plan B. This above scenario would fit that bill.
Agreed, Habs will be looking at younger targets, but it may be trickier than expected - they might need a Plan B. This above scenario would fit that bill.
Last year, Demidov and Buium were players that could’ve/should’ve went higher in the top 15.
Let’s see if MTL snags one this year!
Last year, Demidov and Buium were players that could’ve/should’ve went higher in the top 15.
Let’s see if MTL snags one this year!
I don’t see any team trading a bonafide young 2C… acquiring team will have to either take some risk or overpay (in FA or by giving assets)
I don’t see any team trading a bonafide young 2C… acquiring team will have to either take some risk or overpay (in FA or by giving assets)
I’d want a C with more offensive upside, at the sake of the “200-foot game” (to a degree)
I’d want a C with more offensive upside, at the sake of the “200-foot game” (to a degree)