She's grown so lovely
June 19, 2025 at 8:11 PM
She's grown so lovely
Lols 😆 Same here as well 🤣
January 16, 2024 at 11:47 AM
Lols 😆 Same here as well 🤣
I see. Without that, the bit manipulation would have won
January 16, 2024 at 7:15 AM
I see. Without that, the bit manipulation would have won
Try with larger input.. just trying out
January 16, 2024 at 6:38 AM
Try with larger input.. just trying out
That's right
Over 100 ms.. c'mon
Over 100 ms.. c'mon
January 16, 2024 at 6:34 AM
That's right
Over 100 ms.. c'mon
Over 100 ms.. c'mon
Well.. what can I say 🤷 👍
January 16, 2024 at 6:26 AM
Well.. what can I say 🤷 👍
Nope, I didn't benchmark... I'm just saying based on the nature of their operations.
Though they are almost the same , the bit manipulation tends to perform better under a higher magnitude of data input
Though they are almost the same , the bit manipulation tends to perform better under a higher magnitude of data input
January 16, 2024 at 6:25 AM
Nope, I didn't benchmark... I'm just saying based on the nature of their operations.
Though they are almost the same , the bit manipulation tends to perform better under a higher magnitude of data input
Though they are almost the same , the bit manipulation tends to perform better under a higher magnitude of data input
def reversed(x: int) -> int:
num = 0
for _ in range (512):
num = (num << 1) | (x & 1)
x >>= 1
return num
though, it is longer but is faster than having to convert num to binary string and then reverse it becs it directly manipulates the individual bits.
I may be wrong
January 16, 2024 at 6:01 AM
def reversed(x: int) -> int:
num = 0
for _ in range (512):
num = (num << 1) | (x & 1)
x >>= 1
return num
though, it is longer but is faster than having to convert num to binary string and then reverse it becs it directly manipulates the individual bits.
I may be wrong
There's absolutely a faster way of doing this using bit manipulation. I'll write a simple function to prove it, although I'm busy now but will definitely show u why I said bit manipulation is faster
January 15, 2024 at 9:00 AM
There's absolutely a faster way of doing this using bit manipulation. I'll write a simple function to prove it, although I'm busy now but will definitely show u why I said bit manipulation is faster
I don't agree with you sir.
Python built in l support for bit manipulation is way much faster than the string manipulation
Especially working with large amount of data
Python built in l support for bit manipulation is way much faster than the string manipulation
Especially working with large amount of data
January 15, 2024 at 8:14 AM
I don't agree with you sir.
Python built in l support for bit manipulation is way much faster than the string manipulation
Especially working with large amount of data
Python built in l support for bit manipulation is way much faster than the string manipulation
Especially working with large amount of data
You meant "clearer "...
Obviously not faster
Obviously not faster
January 15, 2024 at 8:00 AM
You meant "clearer "...
Obviously not faster
Obviously not faster
So sad, we won't witness it
January 15, 2024 at 7:45 AM
So sad, we won't witness it
Didn't know the numbers... is that high
January 15, 2024 at 7:17 AM
Didn't know the numbers... is that high
This is soo cool 😎
January 15, 2024 at 7:14 AM
This is soo cool 😎
You're very right ✅️
January 15, 2024 at 7:12 AM
You're very right ✅️
Thought apple claimed iPhone can't be hacked 🤔
January 13, 2024 at 4:28 PM
Thought apple claimed iPhone can't be hacked 🤔
At that moment, u felt "oh shi!t I've gotta post it on blusky" 😆
January 13, 2024 at 4:26 PM
At that moment, u felt "oh shi!t I've gotta post it on blusky" 😆
Thanks for this
January 13, 2024 at 4:23 PM
Thanks for this
Black skin (for the people to be impressed) but white government mindset
January 13, 2024 at 4:16 PM
Black skin (for the people to be impressed) but white government mindset
There are so many things we may never know.
January 13, 2024 at 4:14 PM
There are so many things we may never know.
Lols 😆. Okay will do that
December 10, 2023 at 8:52 PM
Lols 😆. Okay will do that