Shouldn’t he have a PICC line or something in that case? At least to avoid the bruising since it seems to be such a problem for his ”image”…

It’s just that it is impossible to imagine this DoJ releasing a single negative thing about Donald Trump. No matter what the bill says.

”I did not have oral sex with that man”

The weirdest thing is that I’m almost sure that I won’t be able to stop myself from reading it…

Are we sure it’s not some kind of satire…? If that’s the case it’s kind of great.

Yes, but are there any examples to point to where someone does this to MTG? Or are dems just so infatuated with infighting that they want to have this fight although there’s only one side fighting a straw man?

The question is already answered in the headline. He is not defending human rights.

Still confused.

But if anything Epstein-related ever gets out through the DoJ won’t the Trump parts just be emitted or redacted to oblivion?

Does anyone really think she’s become sane? It is still useful that she’s doing this no matter what the reason is.

This ”if you know you know”-aspect of Bluesky is exhausting to me… I know, I know, I should just keep on scrolling…

They are currently doing it in congress. But ok, I’ll put them back…

Ok so if they fail at this and democrats win the midterms despite all efforts at voter suppression, what’s stopping them from just refusing to swear in new democratic representatives to congress?

I was thinking of the endless stream of hate and threats, and the real danger you put yourself in.

Try to imagine what he is sacrificing to stand up against the dangerous idiots in charge and sit down. By the way this kind of insistence on not accepting other parts of the opposition against the regime will probably cost you an extra 5-10 years of living in a dictatorship.