Lina Lefstad
fossilfoolsfelina.bsky.social
Lina Lefstad
@fossilfoolsfelina.bsky.social
PhD candidate, Lund University.
Empowered Futures Member.
Carbon Capture and Storage. Just Climate Change Mitigation.
9/ The article is available open access here: www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.... Huge thanks to my wonderful friend and co-author Natalia, without whom this research would never have been as interesting, critical and fun(!).
From the Rainforest to the Fjords: examining equity in carbon capture and storage climate policy
Carbon capture and storage (CCS) is considered by some to be a critical climate change mitigation technology, and a key element in efforts to limit the global temperature increases in line with the...
www.tandfonline.com
January 15, 2025 at 5:32 PM
8/ In conclusion: CCS must be part of a broader strategy that incorporates exit strategies for fossil fuel dependence and emphasizes sustainable development and climate justice. 🚀🌏
January 15, 2025 at 5:32 PM
7/ CCS should be prioritized for industrial decarbonization activities, not fossil fuel infrastructure. Both Brazil & Norway have opportunities to innovate in this space and support equitable climate solutions. 🌍⚡
January 15, 2025 at 5:32 PM
6/ The way forward? Go beyond cost-efficiency in policy decisions. A multi-criteria analysis could assess equity, environmental impacts, and alternative solutions—not just financial costs. 📊🌱
January 15, 2025 at 5:32 PM
5/ We further warns that economic efficiency arguments for CCS can break down in practice. Projects like Melkøya (Equinor, Norway) show how the costs might outweigh the benefits, and fossil fuel lock-in may not be worth it. 🏗️💡
January 15, 2025 at 5:32 PM
4/ Norway focuses on hard-to-abate industries (e.g., cement) & offshore CO2 storage, possibly aligning with long-term climate goals. Brazil, meanwhile, explores BECCS (bioenergy with CCS) and coal. While coal faces cost and fuel inefficiencies, BECCS brings additional land-use & water concerns. 🌾💧
January 15, 2025 at 5:32 PM
3/ Both countries are CCS leaders, but policy choices can prolong fossil fuel use rather than decarbonizing. This creates risks of fossil fuel lock-in, delaying real climate action. ⛽❌
January 15, 2025 at 5:32 PM
2/ Key insight: Equity matters! Without considering climate justice in policy design, CCS could lead to unjust outcomes, especially for vulnerable communities. It's not just a technical issue—it's deeply political. ⚖️🌍
January 15, 2025 at 5:32 PM
Will give it a read thanks :)
November 27, 2024 at 10:30 AM
Couldn´t thank you all at the time as the chat was closed so a belated THANK YOU for sharing your knowledge and a run-down from Baku. Much appreciated!
November 26, 2024 at 5:12 PM
I SO enjoyed your article - thank you! The profit-motive problem can be said to large degree about CCS-technology as well.
November 26, 2024 at 5:01 PM
Thanks so much for this! I´d love to be added, I work on climate justice and mitigation technologies.
November 22, 2024 at 10:03 AM