Zo las ik het niet eerlijk gezegd. Impliceert niet dat Wikipedia links is, enkel dat het niet-rechts is.
Te goedgelovig misschien… 😀

I would say a B because it felt (to me) like a revolutionary, but obviously correct approach for the future. High cost & performance aren't hard problems to crack given time. Vision Pro in its current form: I would never replace any of my current screens for it. That is a fundamental problem.

Bit surprised that Vision Pro still got a B for 2024 with the reasons boiling down to it having a great single use case with a potential promising future. 2024 is not the future. I see more reasons to draw a parallel with iPad (got a C): continuously unrealized potential. And not in the 80’s either…