Feuerbachiano
@feuerbachiano.bsky.social
La desaparición de la economía de la vida social será el primer paso hacia el comunismo.
Empadronarse y Madrid en la misma frase da un poco de miedo.
August 25, 2025 at 9:35 AM
Empadronarse y Madrid en la misma frase da un poco de miedo.
Solo existirá un derecho internacional donde los países se respeten y las guerras no sean las consecuencias para imponer tratados económicos, cuando se elimine este segundo "orden" económico y social capitalista.
June 17, 2025 at 8:06 AM
Solo existirá un derecho internacional donde los países se respeten y las guerras no sean las consecuencias para imponer tratados económicos, cuando se elimine este segundo "orden" económico y social capitalista.
Y la función de esta no es más que la respuesta militar de EE.UU para forzar a Rusia a suscribirse al orden internacional de 1945.
Ninguna explicación de por qué intervienen los Estados pasa por el derecho internacional.
Ninguna explicación de por qué intervienen los Estados pasa por el derecho internacional.
June 17, 2025 at 8:02 AM
Y la función de esta no es más que la respuesta militar de EE.UU para forzar a Rusia a suscribirse al orden internacional de 1945.
Ninguna explicación de por qué intervienen los Estados pasa por el derecho internacional.
Ninguna explicación de por qué intervienen los Estados pasa por el derecho internacional.
La OTAN que se despliega en Europa bajo la apariencia del acuerdo no es más que la "imposición legal" de una parte sobre la otra donde, en caso de que Europa se negara a la OTAN, EE.UU hubiera entrada en guerra con ella.
June 17, 2025 at 8:01 AM
La OTAN que se despliega en Europa bajo la apariencia del acuerdo no es más que la "imposición legal" de una parte sobre la otra donde, en caso de que Europa se negara a la OTAN, EE.UU hubiera entrada en guerra con ella.
¿Y acaso que se estableció a partir de 1945 sino fue la ley del más fuerte con EE.UU en la cabeza donde puede intervenir en cualquier Estado y los poderes económicos internacionales establecidos estaban y están a su lado frente a Rusia que se negó a incorporarse?
June 17, 2025 at 7:58 AM
¿Y acaso que se estableció a partir de 1945 sino fue la ley del más fuerte con EE.UU en la cabeza donde puede intervenir en cualquier Estado y los poderes económicos internacionales establecidos estaban y están a su lado frente a Rusia que se negó a incorporarse?
Esto no está en el terreno del "pensar" sino que en el terreno real ningún "derecho internacional" ha parado a ningún país de iniciar una guerra.
June 17, 2025 at 7:12 AM
Esto no está en el terreno del "pensar" sino que en el terreno real ningún "derecho internacional" ha parado a ningún país de iniciar una guerra.
¿No ves que el "derecho internacional" se viola sistemáticamente y no tiene validez ni aplicación política ninguna?
No sé honestamente como está obviedad hay que comentarla.
No sé honestamente como está obviedad hay que comentarla.
June 17, 2025 at 6:46 AM
¿No ves que el "derecho internacional" se viola sistemáticamente y no tiene validez ni aplicación política ninguna?
No sé honestamente como está obviedad hay que comentarla.
No sé honestamente como está obviedad hay que comentarla.
Clarke analyses the crises of overaccumulation but says that it is overproduction that produces the crises.
jacobin.com/2025/04/simo...
jacobin.com/2025/04/simo...
Simon Clarke, Theorist of Capitalist Crisis
British sociologist Simon Clarke was one of the most sophisticated analysts of how and why capitalist systems descend into crisis. Clarke’s work on the contradictions of capitalism is a valuable guide...
jacobin.com
May 21, 2025 at 10:34 AM
Clarke analyses the crises of overaccumulation but says that it is overproduction that produces the crises.
jacobin.com/2025/04/simo...
jacobin.com/2025/04/simo...
Clarke said that crises are about overproduction but Roberts proves in practice that they are about overaccumulation.
May 21, 2025 at 10:17 AM
Clarke said that crises are about overproduction but Roberts proves in practice that they are about overaccumulation.
It is over-accumulation and not over-production.
May 21, 2025 at 3:55 AM
It is over-accumulation and not over-production.
What is the aim of the socialist women workers? To abolish all kinds of privileges derived from birth or wealth. It makes no difference to the working woman whether her employer is a man or a woman"
March 23, 2025 at 6:23 PM
What is the aim of the socialist women workers? To abolish all kinds of privileges derived from birth or wealth. It makes no difference to the working woman whether her employer is a man or a woman"
"What is the aim of the bourgeois feminists? To obtain the same advantages, the same power, the same rights in capitalist society as their husbands, fathers and brothers now possess.
March 23, 2025 at 6:23 PM
"What is the aim of the bourgeois feminists? To obtain the same advantages, the same power, the same rights in capitalist society as their husbands, fathers and brothers now possess.
Read her writings and you will see that she is against the feminist movement as a bourgeois inter-class movement. As it is today.
The Bolsheviks had the same position.
The Bolsheviks had the same position.
March 23, 2025 at 6:22 PM
Read her writings and you will see that she is against the feminist movement as a bourgeois inter-class movement. As it is today.
The Bolsheviks had the same position.
The Bolsheviks had the same position.
Kollontai was never a feminist 🤦♂️
March 23, 2025 at 1:31 PM
Kollontai was never a feminist 🤦♂️
The history of Marxism has always been opposed to feminism.
March 23, 2025 at 1:30 PM
The history of Marxism has always been opposed to feminism.
If you answer yes, you are against your own article but with Marx. If you answer no, then you are still in line with your article but against Marx.
March 8, 2025 at 2:13 PM
If you answer yes, you are against your own article but with Marx. If you answer no, then you are still in line with your article but against Marx.
You literally don't respond to anything.
Do you agree that Marx constructs historical materialism as part of a critique of the history of ideas, whether philosophical or economic?
Do you agree that Marx constructs historical materialism as part of a critique of the history of ideas, whether philosophical or economic?
March 8, 2025 at 2:13 PM
You literally don't respond to anything.
Do you agree that Marx constructs historical materialism as part of a critique of the history of ideas, whether philosophical or economic?
Do you agree that Marx constructs historical materialism as part of a critique of the history of ideas, whether philosophical or economic?
And by the way, the summary is part of the content of the article. Best regards.
March 8, 2025 at 2:00 PM
And by the way, the summary is part of the content of the article. Best regards.
You won't understand that I won't read an article that is literally lying from the abstract. Do you get it?
March 8, 2025 at 1:59 PM
You won't understand that I won't read an article that is literally lying from the abstract. Do you get it?
If you don't mind my pointing it out, that's not my problem, but what you say in the abstract is literally untrue.
March 8, 2025 at 1:36 PM
If you don't mind my pointing it out, that's not my problem, but what you say in the abstract is literally untrue.
What content do you want me to read if you literally say that your essay is about the history of ideas from the basis of historical materialism, when historical materialism is built precisely against this idea.
March 8, 2025 at 1:33 PM
What content do you want me to read if you literally say that your essay is about the history of ideas from the basis of historical materialism, when historical materialism is built precisely against this idea.
So the abstract is wrong and the content doesnt talk about the history of ideas? Because then it is the abstract that confuses the content.
March 8, 2025 at 12:46 PM
So the abstract is wrong and the content doesnt talk about the history of ideas? Because then it is the abstract that confuses the content.