Reposted by MK
Do you prefer `.mjs` or `.js` for Node libraries?
I used to favor `.js`, but `.mjs` seems to improve toolchain performance. Since Node will support CJS for the foreseeable future, we need an easier way to tell ESM and CJS apart.
github.com/rolldown/tsd...
I used to favor `.js`, but `.mjs` seems to improve toolchain performance. Since Node will support CJS for the foreseeable future, we need an easier way to tell ESM and CJS apart.
github.com/rolldown/tsd...
feat!: defaults `fixedExtension` to true when platform is `node` by sxzz · Pull Request #517 · rolldown/tsdown
Description
Defaults fixedExtension to true when platform is node.
Linked Issues
Additional context
github.com
September 28, 2025 at 11:02 PM
Do you prefer `.mjs` or `.js` for Node libraries?
I used to favor `.js`, but `.mjs` seems to improve toolchain performance. Since Node will support CJS for the foreseeable future, we need an easier way to tell ESM and CJS apart.
github.com/rolldown/tsd...
I used to favor `.js`, but `.mjs` seems to improve toolchain performance. Since Node will support CJS for the foreseeable future, we need an easier way to tell ESM and CJS apart.
github.com/rolldown/tsd...
Reposted by MK
Just talked about Vite+ at @viteconf.org - check out more at viteplus.dev :)
More detailed announcement on Monday!
More detailed announcement on Monday!
Vite+
The Unified Toolchain for the Web
viteplus.dev
October 10, 2025 at 8:34 AM
Just talked about Vite+ at @viteconf.org - check out more at viteplus.dev :)
More detailed announcement on Monday!
More detailed announcement on Monday!