She/Her. 23.
@fempronounsplease.bsky.social
Transfem, name pending.
Define "work". Returning to Reagan/Clinton-era rates would increase revenue, but, due to the Laffer Curve, there's a limit to how much revenue income taxes can get you. We need pigouvian measures such as meat, carbon, sugar, and land taxes on top.
May 13, 2025 at 9:47 PM
Define "work". Returning to Reagan/Clinton-era rates would increase revenue, but, due to the Laffer Curve, there's a limit to how much revenue income taxes can get you. We need pigouvian measures such as meat, carbon, sugar, and land taxes on top.
Oh, sure, this is an incompetent way to do it, but let's not treat the elderly like the young here, where it's an automatic good to aid them always and we should prioritize it.
May 13, 2025 at 9:45 PM
Oh, sure, this is an incompetent way to do it, but let's not treat the elderly like the young here, where it's an automatic good to aid them always and we should prioritize it.
Actually, raising the age qualification for benefits generally is. Our government budget does have a massive hole in it, and nobody is willing to take the actual measures that would substantially address it; raising the ages for Medicare and Social Security. (That and an LVT.)
May 13, 2025 at 9:29 PM
Actually, raising the age qualification for benefits generally is. Our government budget does have a massive hole in it, and nobody is willing to take the actual measures that would substantially address it; raising the ages for Medicare and Social Security. (That and an LVT.)
The third one is actually good, but the other two are so terrible it doesn't remotely matter.
May 13, 2025 at 9:24 PM
The third one is actually good, but the other two are so terrible it doesn't remotely matter.
I do not fuck horses *or* children, no.
May 5, 2025 at 1:42 AM
I do not fuck horses *or* children, no.
Yes, there is and it is.
May 5, 2025 at 1:37 AM
Yes, there is and it is.
None of those things are true-he never even proved "death threats".
May 5, 2025 at 1:36 AM
None of those things are true-he never even proved "death threats".
May 5, 2025 at 1:32 AM
It matters that he's a pathetic gooner who objectifies cis women and sends hate mobs at trans ones.
May 5, 2025 at 1:23 AM
It matters that he's a pathetic gooner who objectifies cis women and sends hate mobs at trans ones.
That indicates nothing about a second account. All it says is that he hangs out with the sort of people who say "No Nut November", which is *worse* for him.
May 5, 2025 at 1:20 AM
That indicates nothing about a second account. All it says is that he hangs out with the sort of people who say "No Nut November", which is *worse* for him.
Right, okay, so, the U.S. military is kind of like a "great power", and not letting genocide of any group, such as trans people, occur, is what you might call a "great responsibility". Do you catch my drift?
May 2, 2025 at 6:30 AM
Right, okay, so, the U.S. military is kind of like a "great power", and not letting genocide of any group, such as trans people, occur, is what you might call a "great responsibility". Do you catch my drift?
Uh-huh.
Are you familiar with the concept of "Spiderman"?
Are you familiar with the concept of "Spiderman"?
May 2, 2025 at 6:26 AM
Uh-huh.
Are you familiar with the concept of "Spiderman"?
Are you familiar with the concept of "Spiderman"?
If you had the U.S.'s military power?
May 2, 2025 at 6:23 AM
If you had the U.S.'s military power?
Do you not believe institutions exist or something?
What would your response have been to Srebrenica?
What would your response have been to Srebrenica?
May 2, 2025 at 6:16 AM
Do you not believe institutions exist or something?
What would your response have been to Srebrenica?
What would your response have been to Srebrenica?
I never assumed it was.
May 2, 2025 at 6:07 AM
I never assumed it was.
Surely you agree the literal Supreme Court Of The United Kingdom is more of an institution than a group.
May 2, 2025 at 6:07 AM
Surely you agree the literal Supreme Court Of The United Kingdom is more of an institution than a group.
Have you seen the SCOTUK ruling?
May 2, 2025 at 6:00 AM
Have you seen the SCOTUK ruling?
To be fair, Musk and Vance are also Reddit Types, and they were likely the driving behind killing PEPFAR, which is so far just objectively the worst (apart from maybe the nuclear firings) thing this administration has done in a long, awful, Buchanan-surpassing list.
May 1, 2025 at 2:29 AM
To be fair, Musk and Vance are also Reddit Types, and they were likely the driving behind killing PEPFAR, which is so far just objectively the worst (apart from maybe the nuclear firings) thing this administration has done in a long, awful, Buchanan-surpassing list.
This is probably what socks feel like in the dryer.
May 1, 2025 at 2:21 AM
This is probably what socks feel like in the dryer.
Economically the president basically only has a small dial that affects very little and a "FUCK EVERYTHING UP" button. Only Trump and arguably Nixon have actually made use of the latter since WW2.
April 30, 2025 at 2:22 PM
Economically the president basically only has a small dial that affects very little and a "FUCK EVERYTHING UP" button. Only Trump and arguably Nixon have actually made use of the latter since WW2.
No, they really don't. There's no reason why they would besides "large change enables large change", but there are much less destructive large changes than a modern economy becoming communist.
April 29, 2025 at 6:37 PM
No, they really don't. There's no reason why they would besides "large change enables large change", but there are much less destructive large changes than a modern economy becoming communist.
I don't understand how that relates to my point. Economic systems don't change the methods of consumption and production. Those need to be changed directly.
April 29, 2025 at 6:34 PM
I don't understand how that relates to my point. Economic systems don't change the methods of consumption and production. Those need to be changed directly.