Twitter: @silverfighter
Would you trust AI-generated code to go straight into production, or would you want a cleanup specialist in the loop? 🤔
#AI #Coding #SoftwareDevelopment #TechTrends #FutureOfWork
Would you trust AI-generated code to go straight into production, or would you want a cleanup specialist in the loop? 🤔
#AI #Coding #SoftwareDevelopment #TechTrends #FutureOfWork
Maybe this role will be short-lived.
Or maybe it is the bridge between human-centered coding and fully AI-driven development.
Either way, it is a fascinating shift in how we think about code, ownership, and trust.
Maybe this role will be short-lived.
Or maybe it is the bridge between human-centered coding and fully AI-driven development.
Either way, it is a fascinating shift in how we think about code, ownership, and trust.
A Vibe Coding Cleanup Specialist could ensure that AI-generated code meets production standards.
✔️ Secure
✔️ Maintainable
✔️ Trustworthy
It is less about cleaning code and more about governing AI output.
A Vibe Coding Cleanup Specialist could ensure that AI-generated code meets production standards.
✔️ Secure
✔️ Maintainable
✔️ Trustworthy
It is less about cleaning code and more about governing AI output.
At the end of the day, humans are still accountable for what runs in production.
Developers need readable, structured code to debug and maintain systems.
AI is great for prototypes, but not for production.
At the end of the day, humans are still accountable for what runs in production.
Developers need readable, structured code to debug and maintain systems.
AI is great for prototypes, but not for production.
Now the other side.
Yes, we do need Cleanup Specialists.
AI-generated code is not deterministic.
It can introduce subtle bugs, security holes, or unpredictable behavior.
Now the other side.
Yes, we do need Cleanup Specialists.
AI-generated code is not deterministic.
It can introduce subtle bugs, security holes, or unpredictable behavior.
Multiple files, modularity, naming conventions.
All those “best practices” could actually harm AI context.
One big, self-contained blob of code might be better for an AI to process.
When changes are needed, you simply tell the AI: “Fix it and test it.” ✅
Multiple files, modularity, naming conventions.
All those “best practices” could actually harm AI context.
One big, self-contained blob of code might be better for an AI to process.
When changes are needed, you simply tell the AI: “Fix it and test it.” ✅
In that case, readability does not matter.
The code does not have to be human-friendly, it just needs to be machine-friendly.
Maybe the prompt that generated the code is more important than the code itself.
In that case, readability does not matter.
The code does not have to be human-friendly, it just needs to be machine-friendly.
Maybe the prompt that generated the code is more important than the code itself.
First thought: maybe we do not need them.
Clean, structured code is designed for humans.
We read more code than we write.
But what if AI is the one writing, reading, and maintaining the code? 🤖
First thought: maybe we do not need them.
Clean, structured code is designed for humans.
We read more code than we write.
But what if AI is the one writing, reading, and maintaining the code? 🤖
I explained the specifics of event modelling (yes, no capital letter, and double l), starting with bad practices and knowing why and how to avoid them
3/
I explained the specifics of event modelling (yes, no capital letter, and double l), starting with bad practices and knowing why and how to avoid them
3/