Felix
banner
felixbecker.bsky.social
Felix
@felixbecker.bsky.social
web application, golang, fsharp, dotnet, node.js, distributed systems, functional stuff - making internal developer platforms at day
Twitter: @silverfighter
Have fun! 🚀
November 6, 2025 at 7:51 AM
Danke für den netten Austausch!
November 5, 2025 at 6:59 PM
9/
Would you trust AI-generated code to go straight into production, or would you want a cleanup specialist in the loop? 🤔

#AI #Coding #SoftwareDevelopment #TechTrends #FutureOfWork
October 10, 2025 at 8:09 PM
8/
Maybe this role will be short-lived.
Or maybe it is the bridge between human-centered coding and fully AI-driven development.

Either way, it is a fascinating shift in how we think about code, ownership, and trust.
October 10, 2025 at 8:09 PM
7/
A Vibe Coding Cleanup Specialist could ensure that AI-generated code meets production standards.
✔️ Secure
✔️ Maintainable
✔️ Trustworthy

It is less about cleaning code and more about governing AI output.
October 10, 2025 at 8:09 PM
6/
At the end of the day, humans are still accountable for what runs in production.

Developers need readable, structured code to debug and maintain systems.
AI is great for prototypes, but not for production.
October 10, 2025 at 8:09 PM
5/
Now the other side.
Yes, we do need Cleanup Specialists.

AI-generated code is not deterministic.
It can introduce subtle bugs, security holes, or unpredictable behavior.
October 10, 2025 at 8:09 PM
4/
Multiple files, modularity, naming conventions.
All those “best practices” could actually harm AI context.

One big, self-contained blob of code might be better for an AI to process.
When changes are needed, you simply tell the AI: “Fix it and test it.” ✅
October 10, 2025 at 8:09 PM
3/
In that case, readability does not matter.
The code does not have to be human-friendly, it just needs to be machine-friendly.

Maybe the prompt that generated the code is more important than the code itself.
October 10, 2025 at 8:09 PM
2/
First thought: maybe we do not need them.

Clean, structured code is designed for humans.
We read more code than we write.

But what if AI is the one writing, reading, and maintaining the code? 🤖
October 10, 2025 at 8:09 PM
Reposted by Felix
I packed as many of such cases into our talk and the recording from this year’s @dddeu.bsky.social just arrived: www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lf1M...

I explained the specifics of event modelling (yes, no capital letter, and double l), starting with bad practices and knowing why and how to avoid them

3/
Oskar Dudycz - Event-driven Modelling Anti-Patterns - EventCentric 2025
YouTube video by Aardling
www.youtube.com
October 7, 2025 at 6:55 AM
Then give it a new look that people notice from the first glance that there is something different
August 30, 2025 at 6:33 AM
Both look good. Wouldn’t re-record if it’s only for the background.
August 28, 2025 at 1:53 PM
I agree especially when it comes to investing, but don’t people who are experiencing fear always think the their fear is caused by some scary 💩? I guess it goes all down to risk and fear tolerance and spot the real 💩.
August 20, 2025 at 7:31 AM