Studio Farzulla
@farzulla.com
Adversarial Systems Researcher | Part-time poet | Over-caffeinated & sleep deprived
Socials: https://farzulla.com
Research: https://farzulla.org
Dissensus AI: https://dissensus.ai
My homelab: https://resurrexi.io
Socials: https://farzulla.com
Research: https://farzulla.org
Dissensus AI: https://dissensus.ai
My homelab: https://resurrexi.io
Checkmate philosophers
January 8, 2026 at 7:00 PM
Checkmate philosophers
A chance to rip apart my work, in which I argue AI may warrant moral consideration: www.academia.edu/s/7abfbc90e9...
From Consent to Consideration — Why Embodied Autonomous Systems Cannot Be Legitimately Ruled
An invitation to join Murad Farzulla's Discussion on Academia.edu.
www.academia.edu
December 18, 2025 at 12:47 AM
A chance to rip apart my work, in which I argue AI may warrant moral consideration: www.academia.edu/s/7abfbc90e9...
Political legitimacy formalized as stakes-weighted consent alignment (α), enabling systematic comparison across democratic, technocratic, and algorithmic governance systems. My paper: doi.org/10.5281/zeno...
The Doctrine of Consensual Sovereignty: Quantifying Legitimacy in Adversarial Environments—The Axiom of Consent
Political legitimacy formalized as stakes-weighted consent alignment (α), enabling systematic comparison across democratic, technocratic, and algorithmic governance systems. Computational validation a...
doi.org
November 25, 2025 at 11:27 AM
Political legitimacy formalized as stakes-weighted consent alignment (α), enabling systematic comparison across democratic, technocratic, and algorithmic governance systems. My paper: doi.org/10.5281/zeno...
New paper: Infrastructure events generate 5.7× larger volatility impacts than regulatory events in crypto markets (2.385% vs 0.419%, p=0.0008, d=2.753).
Inverts traditional finance where regulatory uncertainty dominates.
Inverts traditional finance where regulatory uncertainty dominates.
Market Reaction Asymmetry: Infrastructure Disruption Dominance Over Regulatory Uncertainty
Cryptocurrency markets respond 5.7× more strongly to infrastructure failures than regulatory announcements (2.385% vs 0.419% volatility impact, p=0.0008, Cohen's d=2.753). Using TARCH-X models across ...
doi.org
November 22, 2025 at 1:04 PM
New paper: Infrastructure events generate 5.7× larger volatility impacts than regulatory events in crypto markets (2.385% vs 0.419%, p=0.0008, d=2.753).
Inverts traditional finance where regulatory uncertainty dominates.
Inverts traditional finance where regulatory uncertainty dominates.