@farmerdw.bsky.social
Tick ALL the privilege boxes then add 40+ years of Anarcho-Syndicalist frustration. Like most individuals, tend to loathe humanity as a species.
Trying to avoid ranting so this is likely to be mostly farming related with the occasional eye roll.
Trying to avoid ranting so this is likely to be mostly farming related with the occasional eye roll.
Ah, an evidence free claim from Mark. Could it be it’s another attempt to manipulate people into giving him money? Never! After all he’s the nice billionaire
January 4, 2026 at 6:05 PM
Ah, an evidence free claim from Mark. Could it be it’s another attempt to manipulate people into giving him money? Never! After all he’s the nice billionaire
If we all work really really hard we can tear down anyone who could do any good, enabling us to wallow in our own waste as we whine.
January 3, 2026 at 9:53 AM
If we all work really really hard we can tear down anyone who could do any good, enabling us to wallow in our own waste as we whine.
Why do I find typing cats or moon cheese more credible?
January 2, 2026 at 11:41 PM
Why do I find typing cats or moon cheese more credible?
Marcus Aurelius would like a word
January 2, 2026 at 2:10 PM
Marcus Aurelius would like a word
People who aren’t billionaires don’t deserve dignity. His mask slips a lot.
January 1, 2026 at 1:49 PM
People who aren’t billionaires don’t deserve dignity. His mask slips a lot.
But could a suitable empowered agency do better? A significant change? But no, that might impact billionaire drug businesses.
January 1, 2026 at 12:59 AM
But could a suitable empowered agency do better? A significant change? But no, that might impact billionaire drug businesses.
Of course they say that. If those rates were profitable they would be dropped. Data?
December 31, 2025 at 11:46 PM
Of course they say that. If those rates were profitable they would be dropped. Data?
But still enabling the extraction of public money to private billionaires it seems.
December 31, 2025 at 6:57 PM
But still enabling the extraction of public money to private billionaires it seems.
Yeah go listen. It’s basically Homer asking “why can’t somebody else do it?”
December 31, 2025 at 6:43 PM
Yeah go listen. It’s basically Homer asking “why can’t somebody else do it?”
Again with the quibbling rather than using a huge reach & unimaginable pile of money to do something useful.
December 29, 2025 at 11:01 PM
Again with the quibbling rather than using a huge reach & unimaginable pile of money to do something useful.
Again with the challenges that undermine progress. Asking questions that delay, derail, demoralise. Not open opposition, just a bucket of sand in the gears of progress at every opportunity.
December 28, 2025 at 10:29 PM
Again with the challenges that undermine progress. Asking questions that delay, derail, demoralise. Not open opposition, just a bucket of sand in the gears of progress at every opportunity.
Several handbooks have been published including advice on slowing / stopping things that activists were against. They all emphasise “making the problem ever larger” and “asking hard questions to derail work”. Mark’s behaviour is indistinguishable from that of
December 26, 2025 at 4:43 PM
Several handbooks have been published including advice on slowing / stopping things that activists were against. They all emphasise “making the problem ever larger” and “asking hard questions to derail work”. Mark’s behaviour is indistinguishable from that of
How about you fund the work for a fully costed proposal? Assemble the best minds available with multi-disciplinary expertise and the required experience. Rather than shoot down people trying. Your current approach doesn’t exactly radiate good faith, more deliberate disruption.
December 25, 2025 at 8:08 PM
How about you fund the work for a fully costed proposal? Assemble the best minds available with multi-disciplinary expertise and the required experience. Rather than shoot down people trying. Your current approach doesn’t exactly radiate good faith, more deliberate disruption.
You are giving it back?
December 25, 2025 at 5:38 PM
You are giving it back?
So it’s OK to make specific accusations of persecution against some people / nations, but not others? Is there a guidebook someplace that says who it is ok to be unpleasant to & who is allowed subsequent comment?
December 25, 2025 at 5:20 PM
So it’s OK to make specific accusations of persecution against some people / nations, but not others? Is there a guidebook someplace that says who it is ok to be unpleasant to & who is allowed subsequent comment?
It’s a loving parody.
December 24, 2025 at 2:03 AM
It’s a loving parody.
Not bad Vlad - extra beetle in your soup tonight.
December 13, 2025 at 1:48 PM
Not bad Vlad - extra beetle in your soup tonight.
That you are demonstrating
December 10, 2025 at 12:01 AM
That you are demonstrating
Ah the “classic” Barbie thinking, not the human one.
December 9, 2025 at 10:26 PM
Ah the “classic” Barbie thinking, not the human one.
I thought you were bored? You should be, that’s a sad life.
November 28, 2025 at 9:26 PM
I thought you were bored? You should be, that’s a sad life.
We’re now trying to figure out how you do make a living. A significant body of opinion is on your still being parasitic on your parents but I am giving some credence to it involving you actually exploiting people with challenges.
November 28, 2025 at 7:51 PM
We’re now trying to figure out how you do make a living. A significant body of opinion is on your still being parasitic on your parents but I am giving some credence to it involving you actually exploiting people with challenges.
So? That doesn’t reduce your entertainment value.
November 28, 2025 at 7:48 PM
So? That doesn’t reduce your entertainment value.
Oh you just had to be AI guy as well didn’t you. What’s next, a Cybertruck?
November 28, 2025 at 7:43 PM
Oh you just had to be AI guy as well didn’t you. What’s next, a Cybertruck?
It’s a quotation from a significant cultural work. Your failure to recognise it isn’t a surprise.
I do feel the need to point out that this isn’t an argument. We can quite happily continue to mock you without your participation.
I do feel the need to point out that this isn’t an argument. We can quite happily continue to mock you without your participation.
November 28, 2025 at 7:40 PM
It’s a quotation from a significant cultural work. Your failure to recognise it isn’t a surprise.
I do feel the need to point out that this isn’t an argument. We can quite happily continue to mock you without your participation.
I do feel the need to point out that this isn’t an argument. We can quite happily continue to mock you without your participation.
I was wrong. Man was way too generous. Folically challenged toddler.
November 28, 2025 at 7:37 PM
I was wrong. Man was way too generous. Folically challenged toddler.