I don’t think the U.S. should intervene. Even if Europe’s tech laws affect American companies, they are mainly meant to protect users and free speech, and countries should have the right to regulate technology in their own way.
@houmanmehrabian.bsky.social

I think the dominant role shouldn’t be only given to frontal motor regions. Parietal network hubs also play an important role in speech production, especially in integrating sensory and language information, so both areas matter.
@houmanmehrabian.bsky.social

I think speech recognition technology is more helpful than harmful because it makes everyday tasks faster and easier. Even though there are privacy concerns, the benefits outweigh the risks
@houmanmehrabian.bsky.social

Is controlling access to speech necessary for public safety, or does it amount to censorship?

Should police be allowed to use AI facial recognition in public spaces, even if it risks privacy violations and biased misidentification?

Yes, a social media ban can potentially harm teens’ social development, community building, and political awareness. If it’s too strict, it may limit how young people connect, express themselves, and stay informed.

I think banning under-16s from social media can do more harm than good if it’s too strict. Instead of full bans, focusing on healthy and limited use is a better way to protect young people.

I agree the government should have some power to limit social media for minors because it can affect mental health. But too much control can feel like overreach, so the focus should be on encouraging healthy, limited use based on what they do online.

Is it justified for governments to ban social media use for minors under a certain age?