@faradisoo.bsky.social
Reposted
Agree. Happy to see the redoubtable Elizabeth Bik got a shout out.
Given that this is WSJ, comments not surprising but lots of “climate change is a hoax”
However, note that collaborators can be problem if PI “too busy” or too little expertise in that aspect to authentically vet data
Given that this is WSJ, comments not surprising but lots of “climate change is a hoax”
However, note that collaborators can be problem if PI “too busy” or too little expertise in that aspect to authentically vet data
Strong story in the WSJ about problem papers. Nice tribute to the sleuths, but happy to be in here saying we're not afraid to talk about this stuff. More collaboration is the way to get there on this. nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com?url=https%3A...
The Band of Debunkers Busting Bad Scientists
Stanford’s president and a high-profile physicist are among those taken down by a growing wave of volunteers who expose faulty or fraudulent research papers
nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com
September 24, 2023 at 5:07 PM
Agree. Happy to see the redoubtable Elizabeth Bik got a shout out.
Given that this is WSJ, comments not surprising but lots of “climate change is a hoax”
However, note that collaborators can be problem if PI “too busy” or too little expertise in that aspect to authentically vet data
Given that this is WSJ, comments not surprising but lots of “climate change is a hoax”
However, note that collaborators can be problem if PI “too busy” or too little expertise in that aspect to authentically vet data