No rush as there is plenty of time for the deadline, but thought I'd raise it.
No rush as there is plenty of time for the deadline, but thought I'd raise it.
And yes, with a WC7 in mind - I don't want a plan to be constrained by a locked player for all 12 weeks.
And yes, with a WC7 in mind - I don't want a plan to be constrained by a locked player for all 12 weeks.
A couple of questions / feature requests based on initial use:
1. It's not possible to lock players for a GW range, right? I want to lock a player for GW1-6 but then remove that for GW7+
2. Allow constraints for ITB value and transfers used across a GW range
A couple of questions / feature requests based on initial use:
1. It's not possible to lock players for a GW range, right? I want to lock a player for GW1-6 but then remove that for GW7+
2. Allow constraints for ITB value and transfers used across a GW range
Is there a reason the order was switched?
Is there a reason the order was switched?