Hahaa, that’s hilarious 😂😂. No slick comeback

@dryasmiyn.bsky.social

3) Advocacy can decrease the probability of negative mental health reports among Black women who have been stopped by the police (advocacy moderates the negative association between police stops and mental health).

For more, read the article 😊 (4/4)

academic.oup.com/sf/advance-a...

When we link this extended notion of police contact to health we find:

1) Preparation is the most commonly reported form of contact and is negatively associated with mental health.

2) Advocacy is positively associated with mental health. (3/4)

or a “constellation of contact-inspired events that, through their connectivity, disrupt temporal bonds and construct police contact as an ongoing phenomenon.”

For Black women this includes direct interaction with officers (i.e., police stops) and PREPARATION and ADVOCACY (2/4)

Thank you Josh! Page and Deckard collab coming sooooonnnnnn

4) The concept of profitable subjects also demonstrates how social constructions structure access to resources and perpetuate inequality within criminal legal processing.

3) Agents’ deployment of marking and surveillance reveals the construction of PROFITABLE SUBJECTS -people (re)identified as future assets. It differs from other neoliberal constructions because it is legible enough for stratification but something that must be repeatedly achieved.

This is noteworthy because in commercial bail a dominate perception is that defendants are liabilities. Consequently, almost no one can opt out of surveillance (not even those who paid in full or showed prior compliance) because a “profitable” status must be continuously proved.

2) How a defendant is marked shapes what “classification situation” they find themselves in, such as what type of surveillance they will endure and with what associated level of hassle.

1. I find that: 1) Bail agents mark defendants as profitable or less-profitable, which creates “new” categories of difference to stratify upon. This is interesting because framing defendants in terms of profit can “riskify” in ways that counter traditional legal understandings.

In this article I ask: 1) How do criminal legal techniques change when private actors (like bail agents) administer them? 2) What do these changes reveal about the construction and processing of system-involved people?

Oops! Embarrassing.I actually think I am included.

Really appreciate your responsiveness though 😊😊😊

Yay! My people! Could I be added to this pack ?