github.com/kth-fabfor/E...
I have also posted my assumptions in making the analysis there!
If you have aby questions or thoughts, don't hesitate to DM me.
#EBU #ESC #Eurovision #Data
github.com/kth-fabfor/E...
I have also posted my assumptions in making the analysis there!
If you have aby questions or thoughts, don't hesitate to DM me.
#EBU #ESC #Eurovision #Data
Yes, the televote was REALLY weird, you are not crazy.
The most likely explanation for it seems to have been a lack of engagement from traditional Eurovision fans, most likely due to a distrust for the EBU and an effort to boycott them due to platforming Israel in the competition.
Yes, the televote was REALLY weird, you are not crazy.
The most likely explanation for it seems to have been a lack of engagement from traditional Eurovision fans, most likely due to a distrust for the EBU and an effort to boycott them due to platforming Israel in the competition.
Fans are in touch with the competition throughout the year, and often against Israeli participation due to the war in Gaza. This is the group that would boycott Eurovision.
Fans are in touch with the competition throughout the year, and often against Israeli participation due to the war in Gaza. This is the group that would boycott Eurovision.
There are 2 signs of this being due to reduced turnout among "fans":
There are 2 signs of this being due to reduced turnout among "fans":
"Fans that would interact with the competition outside of the competition night, for instance through knowing and listening to the songs in advance. Assumed to be the same group that would engage with pre-ESC polling."
i.e. me and you lol 😅
"Fans that would interact with the competition outside of the competition night, for instance through knowing and listening to the songs in advance. Assumed to be the same group that would engage with pre-ESC polling."
i.e. me and you lol 😅
Let me explain! 🤓☝️
Let me explain! 🤓☝️
Why is this interesting? 👀
Why is this interesting? 👀
It should be noted that the televote numbers are the percentage of points awarded, as the vote counts are not released by the EBU, making this analysis significantly more difficult. 🥲
It should be noted that the televote numbers are the percentage of points awarded, as the vote counts are not released by the EBU, making this analysis significantly more difficult. 🥲
Israel - Polling: 4.7%, Televote: 13.5%.
Estonia - Polling: 5.4%, Televote: 11.7%.
Sweden - Polling: 16.1%, Televote: 8.8%.
Austria - Polling: 14.3%, Televote: 8.1%.
Israel - Polling: 4.7%, Televote: 13.5%.
Estonia - Polling: 5.4%, Televote: 11.7%.
Sweden - Polling: 16.1%, Televote: 8.8%.
Austria - Polling: 14.3%, Televote: 8.1%.
The question that remains now is why it was different, and what is responsible for the reduced correlation.
The question that remains now is why it was different, and what is responsible for the reduced correlation.
That year, Ukraine got 439 (of max 468) points from the public, despite only 9% of the pre-ESC polling favoring them as the winner.
2025 had a correlation of 0.59.
That year, Ukraine got 439 (of max 468) points from the public, despite only 9% of the pre-ESC polling favoring them as the winner.
2025 had a correlation of 0.59.
2021: r = 0.87
2022: r = 0.70
2023: r = 0.78
2024: r = 0.81
2025: r = 0.59
While the pre-ESC polling is still (really) statistically significant, its relevance has been greatly reduced.
2021: r = 0.87
2022: r = 0.70
2023: r = 0.78
2024: r = 0.81
2025: r = 0.59
While the pre-ESC polling is still (really) statistically significant, its relevance has been greatly reduced.
This acted as my primary null hypothesis and I was able to safely reject it. This is why:
This acted as my primary null hypothesis and I was able to safely reject it. This is why:
Here it is!
drive.google.com/file/d/19ccL...
Here it is!
drive.google.com/file/d/19ccL...
They will never complain about the inflation from the tariffs, trust me.
They will never complain about the inflation from the tariffs, trust me.