D4N
@f1n0.bsky.social
From 5/12/2000. A reminder that the Daily Mail writes to an agenda, not as an objective observation of reality.
As is true for at least 80% of UK print media.
In 2000 they were rightly concerned that people having access to more information would make peddling unfiltered bullshit more challenging.
As is true for at least 80% of UK print media.
In 2000 they were rightly concerned that people having access to more information would make peddling unfiltered bullshit more challenging.
May 23, 2025 at 4:56 AM
From 5/12/2000. A reminder that the Daily Mail writes to an agenda, not as an objective observation of reality.
As is true for at least 80% of UK print media.
In 2000 they were rightly concerned that people having access to more information would make peddling unfiltered bullshit more challenging.
As is true for at least 80% of UK print media.
In 2000 they were rightly concerned that people having access to more information would make peddling unfiltered bullshit more challenging.