No, there's a statute and related agreements that the court found give Philly a "statutory right and expectation to mutual agreement on any changes or alterations to the . . . President’s House."

Tourism dollars get cited as one reason why that's a concrete interest but aren't the driving force.

Ostensibly, that's because Carey wants to focus her term on attacking the Board's backlog of cases. (Obviously a laudable goal!)

But the memo also says she'll still be working to personally "identify cases" in which she has "a specific interest."