I respectfully disagree
@expected-more.bsky.social
I really love a good argument but its all love so lets be respectful
LMK if you think I'm not being respectful and I will listen.
LMK if you think I'm not being respectful and I will listen.
The biggest plot twist in succession is that shiv is Australian and Tom is British
November 17, 2025 at 10:45 AM
The biggest plot twist in succession is that shiv is Australian and Tom is British
Is there a way to sue someone, perhaps a mother, my mother for instance, in a loving way
Like I'm suing but I'm saying I love you
Like I'm suing but I'm saying I love you
November 17, 2025 at 10:41 AM
Is there a way to sue someone, perhaps a mother, my mother for instance, in a loving way
Like I'm suing but I'm saying I love you
Like I'm suing but I'm saying I love you
For the Democrats to prevail they must become democrats.
They must defend the people in the name of the people, not in the name of the republic.
They must defend the people in the name of the people, not in the name of the republic.
November 11, 2025 at 10:48 AM
For the Democrats to prevail they must become democrats.
They must defend the people in the name of the people, not in the name of the republic.
They must defend the people in the name of the people, not in the name of the republic.
i.e. they brake the law in the name of the people.
The Democrats want to be republicans in the sense that they want to invalidate the legitimacy of elected politicians simply because they have violated the laws of the republic in word or in spirit.
The Democrats want to be republicans in the sense that they want to invalidate the legitimacy of elected politicians simply because they have violated the laws of the republic in word or in spirit.
November 11, 2025 at 10:48 AM
i.e. they brake the law in the name of the people.
The Democrats want to be republicans in the sense that they want to invalidate the legitimacy of elected politicians simply because they have violated the laws of the republic in word or in spirit.
The Democrats want to be republicans in the sense that they want to invalidate the legitimacy of elected politicians simply because they have violated the laws of the republic in word or in spirit.
Another example of the democratic principle (rule of the people) and the republican principle (rule of law) coming into conflict.
Republicans are demagogic in the sense that they rhetorically use the democratic principle to undermine the republican principle.
Republicans are demagogic in the sense that they rhetorically use the democratic principle to undermine the republican principle.
November 11, 2025 at 10:48 AM
Another example of the democratic principle (rule of the people) and the republican principle (rule of law) coming into conflict.
Republicans are demagogic in the sense that they rhetorically use the democratic principle to undermine the republican principle.
Republicans are demagogic in the sense that they rhetorically use the democratic principle to undermine the republican principle.
Why does this irrelevant old man need to say anything
November 5, 2025 at 8:55 AM
Why does this irrelevant old man need to say anything
At the end of the day the Republic has it's own politics
November 5, 2025 at 8:44 AM
At the end of the day the Republic has it's own politics
I think both stalin and Hitler would agree, so maybe "utopia" wasn't the the dangerous ideas in play
October 31, 2025 at 10:44 AM
I think both stalin and Hitler would agree, so maybe "utopia" wasn't the the dangerous ideas in play
I am dyslexic.
When I read a book (like with my eyes)
It better be worth it.
When I read a book (like with my eyes)
It better be worth it.
October 30, 2025 at 2:22 PM
I am dyslexic.
When I read a book (like with my eyes)
It better be worth it.
When I read a book (like with my eyes)
It better be worth it.
It looks like demand and inflation are negatively correlated
October 30, 2025 at 10:50 AM
It looks like demand and inflation are negatively correlated
I watched that film the other day. Bummer ending.
October 30, 2025 at 10:45 AM
I watched that film the other day. Bummer ending.
Actually this is another an example of how they act differently
Just because you can get the money, or a cash flow constraints is satisfied, does not mean the inflation constraint is satisfied
bsky.app/profile/expe...
Just because you can get the money, or a cash flow constraints is satisfied, does not mean the inflation constraint is satisfied
bsky.app/profile/expe...
I think there is a problem looking at nominal wealth of the rich as a tax source, and that is:
The wealth of the rich is held up in asset values, often financial. It's not being used to pitches real things the state would want to spend on.
The wealth of the rich is held up in asset values, often financial. It's not being used to pitches real things the state would want to spend on.
October 29, 2025 at 9:26 PM
Actually this is another an example of how they act differently
Just because you can get the money, or a cash flow constraints is satisfied, does not mean the inflation constraint is satisfied
bsky.app/profile/expe...
Just because you can get the money, or a cash flow constraints is satisfied, does not mean the inflation constraint is satisfied
bsky.app/profile/expe...
Damn is that a positive number?
What are you? Labour aristocracy
What are you? Labour aristocracy
October 29, 2025 at 9:23 PM
Damn is that a positive number?
What are you? Labour aristocracy
What are you? Labour aristocracy
Sounds good let's do it
October 29, 2025 at 9:22 PM
Sounds good let's do it
So taxing the rich would not clear the agregate demand needed for fiscal spending to be non-inflationary
October 29, 2025 at 9:20 PM
So taxing the rich would not clear the agregate demand needed for fiscal spending to be non-inflationary
I think there is a problem looking at nominal wealth of the rich as a tax source, and that is:
The wealth of the rich is held up in asset values, often financial. It's not being used to pitches real things the state would want to spend on.
The wealth of the rich is held up in asset values, often financial. It's not being used to pitches real things the state would want to spend on.
October 29, 2025 at 9:20 PM
I think there is a problem looking at nominal wealth of the rich as a tax source, and that is:
The wealth of the rich is held up in asset values, often financial. It's not being used to pitches real things the state would want to spend on.
The wealth of the rich is held up in asset values, often financial. It's not being used to pitches real things the state would want to spend on.
Thats totally different from the value of the currency decreasing in different sectors for a host of complex and interacting factors
October 29, 2025 at 8:35 PM
Thats totally different from the value of the currency decreasing in different sectors for a host of complex and interacting factors
No, no it's not, that's an inflation constraint.
It works totally differently even if both ultimately mean you can't buy everything on the planet.
A cash flow constraint means income has tobe spiced and their is the possibility that you will fail to raise the cash, and become illiquid
It works totally differently even if both ultimately mean you can't buy everything on the planet.
A cash flow constraint means income has tobe spiced and their is the possibility that you will fail to raise the cash, and become illiquid
October 29, 2025 at 8:35 PM
No, no it's not, that's an inflation constraint.
It works totally differently even if both ultimately mean you can't buy everything on the planet.
A cash flow constraint means income has tobe spiced and their is the possibility that you will fail to raise the cash, and become illiquid
It works totally differently even if both ultimately mean you can't buy everything on the planet.
A cash flow constraint means income has tobe spiced and their is the possibility that you will fail to raise the cash, and become illiquid
These very extreme cases not only prove the point that states don't face cash flow constraints, but are also not compatible to the UK, or China
October 29, 2025 at 8:31 PM
These very extreme cases not only prove the point that states don't face cash flow constraints, but are also not compatible to the UK, or China
In both cases, the economy collapsed but the state still had to buy real imports.
Something similar with WG
In all cases, dispite the hellish economic conditions the state did not collapse and did not face a cash flow constraint.
Something similar with WG
In all cases, dispite the hellish economic conditions the state did not collapse and did not face a cash flow constraint.
October 29, 2025 at 8:31 PM
In both cases, the economy collapsed but the state still had to buy real imports.
Something similar with WG
In all cases, dispite the hellish economic conditions the state did not collapse and did not face a cash flow constraint.
Something similar with WG
In all cases, dispite the hellish economic conditions the state did not collapse and did not face a cash flow constraint.