ExoPol
@exopol.bsky.social
"Für Theokratie, erhängte Schwule, erhängte Ipfer von Vergewaltigungen, die Vernichtung Israels!" Oder so ähnlich. Einfach nur peinlich.
June 23, 2025 at 9:57 AM
"Für Theokratie, erhängte Schwule, erhängte Ipfer von Vergewaltigungen, die Vernichtung Israels!" Oder so ähnlich. Einfach nur peinlich.
The entire thread misses that no one ever claimed that Iran has nukes and that this characterization contradicts the entire reasoning of US/Israel. No matter if you agree or disagree with the action that is just admitting that you don't even know what this is about 🥱
June 23, 2025 at 3:47 AM
The entire thread misses that no one ever claimed that Iran has nukes and that this characterization contradicts the entire reasoning of US/Israel. No matter if you agree or disagree with the action that is just admitting that you don't even know what this is about 🥱
What we also know: Iran did implosion tests, Iran has implosion simulatio software, Iran has ballistic missiles with 2t payload ... we also know that even a guntype design as shown by south Africa can made made to work with a 2t missile. All of this you keep on ignoring.
June 23, 2025 at 3:44 AM
What we also know: Iran did implosion tests, Iran has implosion simulatio software, Iran has ballistic missiles with 2t payload ... we also know that even a guntype design as shown by south Africa can made made to work with a 2t missile. All of this you keep on ignoring.
Again some things we cannot know e.g. israels claim that Iran was going the last step towards a nuke, but also some things we do know based on IAEA. You keep on ignoring this over and over again. Read the IAEA report. It's not that long.
June 23, 2025 at 3:43 AM
Again some things we cannot know e.g. israels claim that Iran was going the last step towards a nuke, but also some things we do know based on IAEA. You keep on ignoring this over and over again. Read the IAEA report. It's not that long.
I am rude yes, but i do offer facts you keep ok ignoring. That's why i am rude.
...
...
June 23, 2025 at 3:34 AM
I am rude yes, but i do offer facts you keep ok ignoring. That's why i am rude.
...
...
In case you don't understand the problem by now you must be close to cognitive impairment.
June 23, 2025 at 3:32 AM
In case you don't understand the problem by now you must be close to cognitive impairment.
The problem begins with that the entire point is that Iran doesn't have a nuke yet.
June 23, 2025 at 3:18 AM
The problem begins with that the entire point is that Iran doesn't have a nuke yet.
Again: the point of contention is wether Iran actually had the intent and made the decision to go all the way to aquire a nuke. Those that deny that Iran had substantial capabilities to potentially get one haven't spend any time on this topic; and yes we can know this.
June 23, 2025 at 3:17 AM
Again: the point of contention is wether Iran actually had the intent and made the decision to go all the way to aquire a nuke. Those that deny that Iran had substantial capabilities to potentially get one haven't spend any time on this topic; and yes we can know this.
You don't engage with my points as if you don't actually understand anything so what do you expect? Also no that's not what an ad hominem is. You are using this as almost synonymous to being rude.
June 23, 2025 at 3:14 AM
You don't engage with my points as if you don't actually understand anything so what do you expect? Also no that's not what an ad hominem is. You are using this as almost synonymous to being rude.
That's not the point. You are too stupid to get it.
June 23, 2025 at 3:06 AM
That's not the point. You are too stupid to get it.
I don't necessarily disagree with you that exiting JCPOA was a mistake, but your comment isnt contradictory to what i wrote. You lacking the attention span to read a few paragraphs explains why you understand so little about the situation right now.
June 22, 2025 at 10:07 PM
I don't necessarily disagree with you that exiting JCPOA was a mistake, but your comment isnt contradictory to what i wrote. You lacking the attention span to read a few paragraphs explains why you understand so little about the situation right now.
That's literally the reality of a threshold nuclear strategy. Your geopolitical illiteracy is no valid argument. So much stupidity on Bluesky about this topic.
June 22, 2025 at 9:46 PM
That's literally the reality of a threshold nuclear strategy. Your geopolitical illiteracy is no valid argument. So much stupidity on Bluesky about this topic.
Iran blocks IAEA inspections since 2021 and has worked to close the gap to a nuke ever since. Your first point is irrelevant and so is your 2nd point. Iran is jn breach with NPT and this very intentionally so another irrelevant point. Another idiotic post on this topic.
June 22, 2025 at 9:43 PM
Iran blocks IAEA inspections since 2021 and has worked to close the gap to a nuke ever since. Your first point is irrelevant and so is your 2nd point. Iran is jn breach with NPT and this very intentionally so another irrelevant point. Another idiotic post on this topic.
Are you all really too stupid to get any of this?
June 22, 2025 at 9:40 PM
Are you all really too stupid to get any of this?
Exceptionally stupid post.
June 22, 2025 at 9:39 PM
Exceptionally stupid post.
Contradictory to the maximal escalation hypothesis is Trumps conduct in this operation that at least attempts to contain escalation to a minimum. It doesn't fit.
June 22, 2025 at 9:37 PM
Contradictory to the maximal escalation hypothesis is Trumps conduct in this operation that at least attempts to contain escalation to a minimum. It doesn't fit.
Knows and dont knows:
1. Iran does has capability to aquire nukes and especially since 2021 has worked to shorten the gap. How much is kind of unknown but the things we do know already put it lower then 1 year. (Backed by IAEA)
2. We don't know if Iran planned to go all the way. (Israels claim)
1. Iran does has capability to aquire nukes and especially since 2021 has worked to shorten the gap. How much is kind of unknown but the things we do know already put it lower then 1 year. (Backed by IAEA)
2. We don't know if Iran planned to go all the way. (Israels claim)
June 22, 2025 at 9:35 PM
Knows and dont knows:
1. Iran does has capability to aquire nukes and especially since 2021 has worked to shorten the gap. How much is kind of unknown but the things we do know already put it lower then 1 year. (Backed by IAEA)
2. We don't know if Iran planned to go all the way. (Israels claim)
1. Iran does has capability to aquire nukes and especially since 2021 has worked to shorten the gap. How much is kind of unknown but the things we do know already put it lower then 1 year. (Backed by IAEA)
2. We don't know if Iran planned to go all the way. (Israels claim)
Trump entering the war now has decreased republican prospects in 2026. This doesn't help Trump unless you want to assume Trump seeks maximal escalation and install himself through emergency mechanisms as dictator. Otherwise your theory makes no sense and this scenario seems highly unlikely.
June 22, 2025 at 9:31 PM
Trump entering the war now has decreased republican prospects in 2026. This doesn't help Trump unless you want to assume Trump seeks maximal escalation and install himself through emergency mechanisms as dictator. Otherwise your theory makes no sense and this scenario seems highly unlikely.
There's thing we do know and other we don't. The existence of substantial quantities of highly enriched Uranium is based on the IAEA that is highly consistent with Irans behavior, capabilities and fits the logic of this conflict. You being uneducated about this is your fault alone.
June 22, 2025 at 9:28 PM
There's thing we do know and other we don't. The existence of substantial quantities of highly enriched Uranium is based on the IAEA that is highly consistent with Irans behavior, capabilities and fits the logic of this conflict. You being uneducated about this is your fault alone.
Your reading comprehension is incredibly bad.
June 22, 2025 at 9:25 PM
Your reading comprehension is incredibly bad.
Your comment is entirely irrelevant as a response. You in fact did not understand what is did write. Read again or not comment at all.
June 22, 2025 at 9:24 PM
Your comment is entirely irrelevant as a response. You in fact did not understand what is did write. Read again or not comment at all.
The claim isnt that Iran has a nuke, but that it is on a treshold, which is a fact and this poses too much of a threat and negotiations are fruitless, which is the major claim that you need to attack if you oppose the war. To meme that this is jus tlike Iraq WMD claim is stupid.
June 18, 2025 at 11:47 PM
The claim isnt that Iran has a nuke, but that it is on a treshold, which is a fact and this poses too much of a threat and negotiations are fruitless, which is the major claim that you need to attack if you oppose the war. To meme that this is jus tlike Iraq WMD claim is stupid.
Those jews also were in arab countries way before 1948. You have no clue about the history of the region and much else. Please just stop commenting on this topic.
June 18, 2025 at 11:38 PM
Those jews also were in arab countries way before 1948. You have no clue about the history of the region and much else. Please just stop commenting on this topic.
Iran has definitely NOT adhered to NPT enriching uranium above 60%. Also Trump entering this war is electoral poison. It will decrease not increase his power. You arent making much sense.
June 18, 2025 at 11:37 PM
Iran has definitely NOT adhered to NPT enriching uranium above 60%. Also Trump entering this war is electoral poison. It will decrease not increase his power. You arent making much sense.