exarch
@exarch404.bsky.social
But Kamala said it.
Last I checked, she was running for President of The United States last year, not prime minister of Israel.
"Elmininating the THREAT Hamas poses" means something different to the intended audience.
Well, at least people not looking to skewer Harris on semantics over it.
Last I checked, she was running for President of The United States last year, not prime minister of Israel.
"Elmininating the THREAT Hamas poses" means something different to the intended audience.
Well, at least people not looking to skewer Harris on semantics over it.
November 19, 2025 at 9:45 PM
But Kamala said it.
Last I checked, she was running for President of The United States last year, not prime minister of Israel.
"Elmininating the THREAT Hamas poses" means something different to the intended audience.
Well, at least people not looking to skewer Harris on semantics over it.
Last I checked, she was running for President of The United States last year, not prime minister of Israel.
"Elmininating the THREAT Hamas poses" means something different to the intended audience.
Well, at least people not looking to skewer Harris on semantics over it.
Asking for footage now of Biden explicitly promoting the genocide.
Your idea of "well he wasn't being strict enough on Israel" is not going to cut it.
I think not withholding weapons was not the right approach, but it's a far cry from "actively promoting genocide".
Your idea of "well he wasn't being strict enough on Israel" is not going to cut it.
I think not withholding weapons was not the right approach, but it's a far cry from "actively promoting genocide".
November 19, 2025 at 9:18 PM
Asking for footage now of Biden explicitly promoting the genocide.
Your idea of "well he wasn't being strict enough on Israel" is not going to cut it.
I think not withholding weapons was not the right approach, but it's a far cry from "actively promoting genocide".
Your idea of "well he wasn't being strict enough on Israel" is not going to cut it.
I think not withholding weapons was not the right approach, but it's a far cry from "actively promoting genocide".
Because bombing Iran really solved *THAT* problem too, right?
Right?
Right?
November 19, 2025 at 9:10 PM
Because bombing Iran really solved *THAT* problem too, right?
Right?
Right?
And then they decided to kill a whole bunch of people and they stopped being noble.
It's OK to want to be free.
It's not OK to kill loads of innocent people to achieve that goal.
I have more respect for Iraqi insurgents, because they at least were targetting the occupiers, not random civilians.
It's OK to want to be free.
It's not OK to kill loads of innocent people to achieve that goal.
I have more respect for Iraqi insurgents, because they at least were targetting the occupiers, not random civilians.
November 19, 2025 at 9:08 PM
And then they decided to kill a whole bunch of people and they stopped being noble.
It's OK to want to be free.
It's not OK to kill loads of innocent people to achieve that goal.
I have more respect for Iraqi insurgents, because they at least were targetting the occupiers, not random civilians.
It's OK to want to be free.
It's not OK to kill loads of innocent people to achieve that goal.
I have more respect for Iraqi insurgents, because they at least were targetting the occupiers, not random civilians.
Exactly.
Which is why I think this would've gone differently than it did under Trump.
Whether that would've been better then what's happening now is anyone's guess.
Which is why I think this would've gone differently than it did under Trump.
Whether that would've been better then what's happening now is anyone's guess.
November 19, 2025 at 9:04 PM
Exactly.
Which is why I think this would've gone differently than it did under Trump.
Whether that would've been better then what's happening now is anyone's guess.
Which is why I think this would've gone differently than it did under Trump.
Whether that would've been better then what's happening now is anyone's guess.
I think it's safe to say she would've handled it differently than Trump did.
Like I said, we'll never know if that would've been better or worse for Palestine. My guess is in the long run it would've been better.
Like I said, we'll never know if that would've been better or worse for Palestine. My guess is in the long run it would've been better.
November 19, 2025 at 9:00 PM
I think it's safe to say she would've handled it differently than Trump did.
Like I said, we'll never know if that would've been better or worse for Palestine. My guess is in the long run it would've been better.
Like I said, we'll never know if that would've been better or worse for Palestine. My guess is in the long run it would've been better.
Google Katie Johnson.
One rape allegation is potentially a hoax, two is concerning, More than 25 is definitely a pattern.
By the way, Katie was 13.
That's what legal folks call "statutory rape" but is colloquially referred to as "pedophilia".
One rape allegation is potentially a hoax, two is concerning, More than 25 is definitely a pattern.
By the way, Katie was 13.
That's what legal folks call "statutory rape" but is colloquially referred to as "pedophilia".
November 19, 2025 at 8:58 PM
Google Katie Johnson.
One rape allegation is potentially a hoax, two is concerning, More than 25 is definitely a pattern.
By the way, Katie was 13.
That's what legal folks call "statutory rape" but is colloquially referred to as "pedophilia".
One rape allegation is potentially a hoax, two is concerning, More than 25 is definitely a pattern.
By the way, Katie was 13.
That's what legal folks call "statutory rape" but is colloquially referred to as "pedophilia".
Ashley Biden wasn't forced to take a shower with her dad.
The excerpts of her diary are out there, you could read what she really wrote if you actually cared to be right.
The excerpts of her diary are out there, you could read what she really wrote if you actually cared to be right.
November 19, 2025 at 8:53 PM
Ashley Biden wasn't forced to take a shower with her dad.
The excerpts of her diary are out there, you could read what she really wrote if you actually cared to be right.
The excerpts of her diary are out there, you could read what she really wrote if you actually cared to be right.
Ah yeah, Shrödinger's president.
Simultaneously a crime boss who outwitted all of the DOJ investigations, but also too old and demented to even breathe on his own.
I am going to deny that, because it's a MAGA fantasy.
Simultaneously a crime boss who outwitted all of the DOJ investigations, but also too old and demented to even breathe on his own.
I am going to deny that, because it's a MAGA fantasy.
November 19, 2025 at 8:48 PM
Ah yeah, Shrödinger's president.
Simultaneously a crime boss who outwitted all of the DOJ investigations, but also too old and demented to even breathe on his own.
I am going to deny that, because it's a MAGA fantasy.
Simultaneously a crime boss who outwitted all of the DOJ investigations, but also too old and demented to even breathe on his own.
I am going to deny that, because it's a MAGA fantasy.
This case is all but dismissed.
There is no evidence.
Same with the Leticia James case.
Probably more of the same with Adam Schiff and Jack Smith.
There is no case, but Trump wants to see them indicted.
So there'll be a bunch of resignations until someone's willing to risk their reputation.
There is no evidence.
Same with the Leticia James case.
Probably more of the same with Adam Schiff and Jack Smith.
There is no case, but Trump wants to see them indicted.
So there'll be a bunch of resignations until someone's willing to risk their reputation.
November 19, 2025 at 8:43 PM
This case is all but dismissed.
There is no evidence.
Same with the Leticia James case.
Probably more of the same with Adam Schiff and Jack Smith.
There is no case, but Trump wants to see them indicted.
So there'll be a bunch of resignations until someone's willing to risk their reputation.
There is no evidence.
Same with the Leticia James case.
Probably more of the same with Adam Schiff and Jack Smith.
There is no case, but Trump wants to see them indicted.
So there'll be a bunch of resignations until someone's willing to risk their reputation.
I don't think ICE would have existed as it does now, nor being used as it is today.
But you're a fool if you think immigration wasn't in need of some reform.
It just wasn't in need of mass indiscriminate deportations or racial profiling.
But you're a fool if you think immigration wasn't in need of some reform.
It just wasn't in need of mass indiscriminate deportations or racial profiling.
November 19, 2025 at 8:39 PM
I don't think ICE would have existed as it does now, nor being used as it is today.
But you're a fool if you think immigration wasn't in need of some reform.
It just wasn't in need of mass indiscriminate deportations or racial profiling.
But you're a fool if you think immigration wasn't in need of some reform.
It just wasn't in need of mass indiscriminate deportations or racial profiling.
Perhaps it may be factually true that Nethanyahu funded Hamas.
That's where the facts end. Everything else is conjecture on your part.
That's where the facts end. Everything else is conjecture on your part.
November 19, 2025 at 8:37 PM
Perhaps it may be factually true that Nethanyahu funded Hamas.
That's where the facts end. Everything else is conjecture on your part.
That's where the facts end. Everything else is conjecture on your part.
I'm not.
I'm taking time out of my day to try and explain that I think both sides are responsible for the mess they got themselves into, and giving Hamas a pass just because Israel is killing more people right now is naive.
But in case it bears repeating: I don't support Israeli genocide either.
I'm taking time out of my day to try and explain that I think both sides are responsible for the mess they got themselves into, and giving Hamas a pass just because Israel is killing more people right now is naive.
But in case it bears repeating: I don't support Israeli genocide either.
November 19, 2025 at 8:26 PM
I'm not.
I'm taking time out of my day to try and explain that I think both sides are responsible for the mess they got themselves into, and giving Hamas a pass just because Israel is killing more people right now is naive.
But in case it bears repeating: I don't support Israeli genocide either.
I'm taking time out of my day to try and explain that I think both sides are responsible for the mess they got themselves into, and giving Hamas a pass just because Israel is killing more people right now is naive.
But in case it bears repeating: I don't support Israeli genocide either.
It's not my recommended strategy.
But the right ran a really good misinformation campaign, making many swing voters decide based on campaign points Harris didn't actually campaign on.
Most of it wasn't actually that different from what Mamdani campaigned on.
But the right ran a really good misinformation campaign, making many swing voters decide based on campaign points Harris didn't actually campaign on.
Most of it wasn't actually that different from what Mamdani campaigned on.
November 19, 2025 at 8:19 PM
It's not my recommended strategy.
But the right ran a really good misinformation campaign, making many swing voters decide based on campaign points Harris didn't actually campaign on.
Most of it wasn't actually that different from what Mamdani campaigned on.
But the right ran a really good misinformation campaign, making many swing voters decide based on campaign points Harris didn't actually campaign on.
Most of it wasn't actually that different from what Mamdani campaigned on.
Definitely not:
Corruption
Sexual abuse
Murder
and yes, supporting genocide.
You can argue semantics as much as you want, but Harris was not supporting genocide, no matter how much you like to keep pretending she was.
Corruption
Sexual abuse
Murder
and yes, supporting genocide.
You can argue semantics as much as you want, but Harris was not supporting genocide, no matter how much you like to keep pretending she was.
November 19, 2025 at 8:12 PM
Definitely not:
Corruption
Sexual abuse
Murder
and yes, supporting genocide.
You can argue semantics as much as you want, but Harris was not supporting genocide, no matter how much you like to keep pretending she was.
Corruption
Sexual abuse
Murder
and yes, supporting genocide.
You can argue semantics as much as you want, but Harris was not supporting genocide, no matter how much you like to keep pretending she was.
Oh, I'm not defending Israel either.
They definitely overreacted to the Hamas attack, with sadly predictable results. Everyone involved ensured that this conflict will keep on giving for decades to come.
But I'm sure even Hamas didn't expect it to become THIS bad this quickly.
They definitely overreacted to the Hamas attack, with sadly predictable results. Everyone involved ensured that this conflict will keep on giving for decades to come.
But I'm sure even Hamas didn't expect it to become THIS bad this quickly.
November 19, 2025 at 8:06 PM
Oh, I'm not defending Israel either.
They definitely overreacted to the Hamas attack, with sadly predictable results. Everyone involved ensured that this conflict will keep on giving for decades to come.
But I'm sure even Hamas didn't expect it to become THIS bad this quickly.
They definitely overreacted to the Hamas attack, with sadly predictable results. Everyone involved ensured that this conflict will keep on giving for decades to come.
But I'm sure even Hamas didn't expect it to become THIS bad this quickly.
I don't know If Kamala would've done much better than Trump in getting a cease fire or a peace deal (because effectively, there really is no cease fire anyway), but she sure as hell cared more, about both sides in this conflict, and getting it resolved, than the guy who got elected instead.
November 19, 2025 at 8:02 PM
I don't know If Kamala would've done much better than Trump in getting a cease fire or a peace deal (because effectively, there really is no cease fire anyway), but she sure as hell cared more, about both sides in this conflict, and getting it resolved, than the guy who got elected instead.
Why do you think that's impossible?
Children DID die during the initial attacks in Israel.
www.factcheck.org/2023/11/doze...
Children DID die during the initial attacks in Israel.
www.factcheck.org/2023/11/doze...
Dozens of Children Died in Hamas' Oct. 7 Attack on Israel, Contrary to Online Claim - FactCheck.org
At least 29 children have been identified by international authorities as having died in the Oct. 7 attack on Israel by Hamas. But a video, citing a post deleted by the World Jewish Congress, has been...
www.factcheck.org
November 19, 2025 at 7:56 PM
Why do you think that's impossible?
Children DID die during the initial attacks in Israel.
www.factcheck.org/2023/11/doze...
Children DID die during the initial attacks in Israel.
www.factcheck.org/2023/11/doze...
No, I'm saying the people comitting genocide are not the Israeli public.
But resolving this conflict requires negotiations between Hamas terrorists and Israeli politicians perpetrating the genocide.
And unfortunately, Palestinians in Gaza, the real victims here, have no seat at the table.
But resolving this conflict requires negotiations between Hamas terrorists and Israeli politicians perpetrating the genocide.
And unfortunately, Palestinians in Gaza, the real victims here, have no seat at the table.
November 19, 2025 at 7:53 PM
No, I'm saying the people comitting genocide are not the Israeli public.
But resolving this conflict requires negotiations between Hamas terrorists and Israeli politicians perpetrating the genocide.
And unfortunately, Palestinians in Gaza, the real victims here, have no seat at the table.
But resolving this conflict requires negotiations between Hamas terrorists and Israeli politicians perpetrating the genocide.
And unfortunately, Palestinians in Gaza, the real victims here, have no seat at the table.
I'm not saying Israel's response is valid.
I *AM* saying Hamas' attacks were not a basic human right.
Your right to freedom ends the moment it requires you to kill random innocent people to achieve it.
That goes for both sides, not just one.
I *AM* saying Hamas' attacks were not a basic human right.
Your right to freedom ends the moment it requires you to kill random innocent people to achieve it.
That goes for both sides, not just one.
November 19, 2025 at 7:47 PM
I'm not saying Israel's response is valid.
I *AM* saying Hamas' attacks were not a basic human right.
Your right to freedom ends the moment it requires you to kill random innocent people to achieve it.
That goes for both sides, not just one.
I *AM* saying Hamas' attacks were not a basic human right.
Your right to freedom ends the moment it requires you to kill random innocent people to achieve it.
That goes for both sides, not just one.
No, I disagree.
I think Hamas deserves being condemned as well for their initial attack on Israel.
I'm not saying both are equal in magnitude, but unlike you, I'm also willing to condemn THAT rather than jumping on the "genocide bad so all Israelis bad" bandwagon.
I think Hamas deserves being condemned as well for their initial attack on Israel.
I'm not saying both are equal in magnitude, but unlike you, I'm also willing to condemn THAT rather than jumping on the "genocide bad so all Israelis bad" bandwagon.
November 19, 2025 at 7:39 PM
No, I disagree.
I think Hamas deserves being condemned as well for their initial attack on Israel.
I'm not saying both are equal in magnitude, but unlike you, I'm also willing to condemn THAT rather than jumping on the "genocide bad so all Israelis bad" bandwagon.
I think Hamas deserves being condemned as well for their initial attack on Israel.
I'm not saying both are equal in magnitude, but unlike you, I'm also willing to condemn THAT rather than jumping on the "genocide bad so all Israelis bad" bandwagon.
Looking at a bunch of terrorists slaughtering people in the street and thinking "nah, they did not provoke this" is also a take.
I'm not condoning the response from the Israeli side, but I cannot say it's completely unexpected.
Especially after 70 years of violence from both sides.
I'm not condoning the response from the Israeli side, but I cannot say it's completely unexpected.
Especially after 70 years of violence from both sides.
November 19, 2025 at 7:34 PM
Looking at a bunch of terrorists slaughtering people in the street and thinking "nah, they did not provoke this" is also a take.
I'm not condoning the response from the Israeli side, but I cannot say it's completely unexpected.
Especially after 70 years of violence from both sides.
I'm not condoning the response from the Israeli side, but I cannot say it's completely unexpected.
Especially after 70 years of violence from both sides.
I'm condemning both the instigators of the genocide, as well as the people comitting the genocide.
I'm not condemning the victims.
On either side.
A cease fire takes both sides to agree to the terms.
That's the instigators and the perpetrators. No one is representing the victims in these talks.
I'm not condemning the victims.
On either side.
A cease fire takes both sides to agree to the terms.
That's the instigators and the perpetrators. No one is representing the victims in these talks.
November 19, 2025 at 7:31 PM
I'm condemning both the instigators of the genocide, as well as the people comitting the genocide.
I'm not condemning the victims.
On either side.
A cease fire takes both sides to agree to the terms.
That's the instigators and the perpetrators. No one is representing the victims in these talks.
I'm not condemning the victims.
On either side.
A cease fire takes both sides to agree to the terms.
That's the instigators and the perpetrators. No one is representing the victims in these talks.
I'm not arguing genocide isn't bad.
I'm not arguing sending Israel weapons is the way to resolve this conflict.
I'm saying that selling out one party to assist the other is not the solution either.
Most Israelis are not actively killing Palestinians, but their lives could also be at risk anyway.
I'm not arguing sending Israel weapons is the way to resolve this conflict.
I'm saying that selling out one party to assist the other is not the solution either.
Most Israelis are not actively killing Palestinians, but their lives could also be at risk anyway.
November 19, 2025 at 7:25 PM
I'm not arguing genocide isn't bad.
I'm not arguing sending Israel weapons is the way to resolve this conflict.
I'm saying that selling out one party to assist the other is not the solution either.
Most Israelis are not actively killing Palestinians, but their lives could also be at risk anyway.
I'm not arguing sending Israel weapons is the way to resolve this conflict.
I'm saying that selling out one party to assist the other is not the solution either.
Most Israelis are not actively killing Palestinians, but their lives could also be at risk anyway.
What would you have her do differently without compromising on Israel's safety?
Or is Israel's safety the problem?
Would you leave the country open for a retaliatory genocide by Iran?
I'm not saying Biden's aproach was flawless, but there wasn't a whole lot more besides what was already being done
Or is Israel's safety the problem?
Would you leave the country open for a retaliatory genocide by Iran?
I'm not saying Biden's aproach was flawless, but there wasn't a whole lot more besides what was already being done
November 19, 2025 at 7:14 PM
What would you have her do differently without compromising on Israel's safety?
Or is Israel's safety the problem?
Would you leave the country open for a retaliatory genocide by Iran?
I'm not saying Biden's aproach was flawless, but there wasn't a whole lot more besides what was already being done
Or is Israel's safety the problem?
Would you leave the country open for a retaliatory genocide by Iran?
I'm not saying Biden's aproach was flawless, but there wasn't a whole lot more besides what was already being done