No, TurnItIn. AI is *shallow* learning. It is *anti-intellectual.*

Question 1 is a doozy

This description from Wikipedia’s info for identifying AI-generated content is so good.

The hardest working man in baseball (at least affectively) (MLB photo)

It’s here! This was such a long process, and I joked with the editors that looking at the proofs this summer was like opening a time capsule. The world has gone through so many upheavals, and these analyses are just as important as ever.

Sorry, moved too quickly between things this morning. I liked the phrase “disembodied knowledge” and it reminded me of this other ref to “collective intelligence” which didn’t sit well with me. Misquoted you in my haste.

With Grammarly's grade predictor tool (Grammarly takes the next step of surveilling the instructor)

Compare the PAIRR recommended bot:

y'all, the "AI assist" tripping over itself in internet search results:

This, in the report from @ainowinstitute.bsky.social, is so key and so dangerous in an era when so many folks just *want* magic, authoritarian answers rather than trust real people with real knowledge and expertise. Not even exaggerating: ushering in a new dark age of anti-knowledge.

Yesterday my image AI thought this plant was a reptile. 🦎

These lilacs are pretty great.

Baseball narrative is so fixed about the Dodgers that the standings look like this right now 🙃

This should remind us how warped social media versions of reality are. On Friday, this site was lit up by screams about a coup in the U.S. Today's trending topics:

So maybe Agatha Christie wasn’t a social critic, but she was kinda a social empath.