Yes, it really does.

Although I think it's not universal even then, since so many Trump supporters are white supremacists, misogynists, homophobes, transphobes, etc.

This feels like the "but there were good people who owned other people; some of them didn't even rape the people they called property" nonsense that's gotten so popular.

Of course, if your privilege doesn't protect you, it's not privilege. There's been a shift in who has privilege.

So I guess the people who care now but didn't before had to lose their privilege to care what happens to people without it.

Isn't it a pity that things have to get to things to get to this point for a lot of privileged people to care?

The cruelty is the point.

They all smell more or less the same to me but that could be an H-E-B store brand thing.

But it might be hard to find a lower court to take the case or convince Congress to convict him.

A lower court conviction would just be overturned on appeal.

And Congress is--more bad things than the character limit will allow.

I'm pretty sure that crazy ruling that the president's official acts are never crimes covers constitutional crimes, too.

I mean, the ruling is bizarre and arguably unconstitutional itself and certainly violates the spirit and intention of the Constitution.

I'm older than he is, and my reaction to him is also "ew."

I'm allergic, so I don't.

Just fyi, a lot of products with unnecessary scents can cause bad reactions in people with allergies or sensitivities and are also common migraine triggers.

(Plus, to me, the smell is man armpit *and* garbage.)

Yes