To be fair I don’t think many cats actually love being picked up even when they have had very traditional “upbringings.” I’d say most tolerate it, some will never allow it but can be perfectly cuddly and sociable otherwise.

Make sure you put little pads under the legs of your chairs and table! You don’t that what gorgeous shiny floor to get ugly scratches.

This is what I suspect. I’m taking the conspiracy a bit further. Maybe they didn’t allow participants to actually choose their charity because they would have had to vet them and it’s a legal hassle for 19 participants. So maybe they pre-selected a couple and told participant to just pick one.

Also would have genuinely loved to know which charity everyone was playing for!
They were so discreet about it, it almost sounded like they had been contractually obliged not to name their charity.

Australian eSafety Commissioner would probably know/have something to do with it. I suspect it’s done out of “wanting to help” without too much thought put into actually cases/risk of abuse but I might be wrong.

Am I missing a trick or are they totally ignoring the fact that seeing original artwork involves getting out of your house, walking a bit, being around people in a usually quite pleasant space? All factors could be affecting biological data a great deal more than the authenticity of the art?

Toujours trop court!!

Majesty not majority obvs.

Look, he deserves some understanding. How else was this sweaty man going to smear his dirty hands on a young woman’s face?
(I’m talking about Alan, yeah).

Not that they would worry themselves too much with facts but I think they should check out the way mizrahim tend to vote in Israel. (Or for that in France where the majority of Jews are Sepharadic).

Oh I know but as a French-British-Israeli citizen living in Germany I just think the other 12% are much more charming and interesting with more interesting dilemmas and you could make better series about us. Very unbiased opinion here 😉

Come and make Netflix series about those of us who live in France, in the U.K., in Argentina, in South Africa, in Australia and Uzbekistan. We also have a nice sense of humour but we eat different food, don’t live in enormous suburban houses and you might discover not everyone is Ashkenazi.

« Présumé innocent »?!? Euh ils comprennent le concept d’être condamné ou on leur explique?

Which leads me to rule #2 of catching benefit fraudsters. Just don’t. You’ll waste way more money in attempt at catching hypothetical fraudsters than if you just hand out the pretty minimal amount of benefit people get anyway.