2nd question: what is stopping; if proven advantageous for votes and the pendulum swing to a point of bipartisan vitriol to similar extent on both Democrat and Republican side, and democrats give into demands; politicians who aren’t trans but feel this apathy towards us? You see the slope yet?

-to children and innocence, I have 2 questions: 1. Are you anywhere near a position to to moralize ppl who defend Oct 7th whether acknowledging out of disgust of Israel past actions or alternatively pure antisem?-

-acknowledges that taking a position against a literal genocide (something that is in no way shape or form even close to defensible especially anywhere on liberal-left praxis, Contrapoints specifically agrees it is a genocide in her own words! If you can acknowledge such acts happening especially-

-it is about the reality of it, we can talk about the hypothetical getting to that point itself ig but the point is with trans people, yes our rights are malleable, to an extent that in a extreme case of giving into tent expansion, even if they are still liberal on other issues, contrapoints-

-even just said yes and then talk about her caveats, even from a optics standpoint it was stupid which is the craziest part, the issue is that an optical failing of democratic politicians is barebones understanding and being out of touch on voter based needs, we aren’t advocating against voting ffs

-why is it not easy, especially when the interviewer said broadly/generally speaking, and the context of ACCESS, key word, bc if a doctor or state law is discriminatory towards people who need said care, speaking about “following the law” on a question of principle is fucking spineless, could have-

-out of context, ppl defending hasan here is saying that there is clearly more context which is clear even in the clip op posted, and that it is a response to a discussion optics in relation to us being bold and consistent even on controversial topics (Kamala couldn’t even say the bare minimum ffs-

Ok, do you agree that context of the conversation: the point he is specifically pushing back on and the overall premise and hypothetical is extremely important part to put to the point where he could have definitely been clear on his point, he again (like any other streamer) might have been clip-

-can be malleable to a extreme degree, Imma stop here and respond and see if you are good faith and it is worth my effort explaining in full, I don’t much care for pride in social media arguments so Im not wasting my energy on bs debate bro tactics.

[and I am saying federal besides state to be good faith but the context seems more around giving doctors main autonomy on our healthcare in the limits of “law” which would imply being bound to state laws also] this is relative and arbitrary when at both a federal and state lvl even adult’s access-

-being fully engaged in being blunt around someone’s access to healthcare (you agree Hasan should have had better rhetoric and articulated better about his point, do you say the same for Kamala about a yes or no question of a medical necessity being determined by following the “federal law” which-

-we are actually far gone even from a respectability and non bias moderation/fact checking standpoint). Tldr: the debate is around intersection of consistency, principle, logic and optics: (imo these are only good when we don’t place one over the other vs “this group is so marginalized us not-

-Hasan was responding to is around Erza Klein and Ta-Nehisi Coates disagree (based around a Vanity Fair article made by Coates on the premise of Charlie Kirk’s legacy and the over sanitization therein of his “good qualities” for his legacy “even then if he is the standard for debate nowadays then-

-didn’t even show who hasan was responding to, like I am not a hasan fanatic and definitely do think he does say stupid shit whether in context or poorly articulated, but in this case no you are indeed not getting the point, youtu.be/q8au9byrw5k?... timestamp to 2:28:38 the premise of the vid-

God my guy would it kill you to not be a impudent piece of shit, like I get being heated by other comments but stormy is isn’t going nearly as hard as you think, the issue is the framing people are using to critique hasan in general, this is why full context (even beyond this clip chimp that-