euler13.bsky.social
@euler13.bsky.social
Didn’t need it. She had eyes.

True story, she was also in late pregnancy when she found out her Fiancée Amadeo Modigliani had died from tubercular meningitis complicated by alcoholism. She threw herself out of a window 5 storeys high.
December 20, 2025 at 2:22 PM
You lost to Trump too, didn’t you?
December 19, 2025 at 4:31 PM
I wouldn’t sleep with you, you have untreated syphilis.
December 19, 2025 at 4:23 PM
Not even pre-algebra? Can you do arithmetic?
December 19, 2025 at 4:20 PM
I’m not a democrat.

I don’t understand why you insist using words and concepts when you don’t understand the meaning. Try grunting. You’ll sound more intelligent.

Have you ever taken pre-algebra?
December 19, 2025 at 4:18 PM
I didn’t vote for trump genius. Look at my feed.
December 19, 2025 at 4:09 PM
You clearly like to make wild, specious assumptions and tie them together with irrational logic. There’s no scale by which you can measure any compromises that I’ve ever made, where they are worse than yours.

The ghosts of Venezuelans killed at sea would like a word with you.
December 19, 2025 at 4:05 PM
You keep talking about religion but I’m agnostic. Why do you make shit up? You’re dysregulated.

We can all make shit up. I can say you have untreated syphilis and put too much pepper on scrambled eggs. So the fuck what?
December 19, 2025 at 5:23 AM
At some point the word you were looking for is ‘you’re.’

It’s not my fault and also I’m a genocidal maniac? Do you always contradict yourself? You know absolutely nothing about me, and you make up wild non-sequitur accusations. Do you do that all the time?
December 19, 2025 at 4:48 AM
That’s our fault.
December 19, 2025 at 4:43 AM
If by interpret the signs you mean come up with the most plausible explanation for all the facts, yeah.

That’s the point. Plausible explanations explain all the facts. They’re not just wishful thinking lists riddled with personal biases.

WRT gods, presidents are temporary servants not masters.
December 19, 2025 at 4:27 AM
When their biggest seller is unfiltered Camels.
December 19, 2025 at 4:21 AM
Is gender. All 3 ran against the same candidate that would get fired from teaching elementary science because he thinks wet magnets don’t work.

So tell me what other reason 2 out of 3 virtually identical candidates would lose by the closest margin since bush v gore and Biden trounces trump.
December 19, 2025 at 4:11 AM
There’s a strong argument that a generic white male democrat would’ve beaten trump in 2024.

Interestingly more people showed up at the polls in 2024 than they did in 2020. So the people that abstained from voting for Harris still voted.

The biggest difference between Clinton, Biden and Harris/2
December 19, 2025 at 4:08 AM
Trump lost to Biden by 7 million votes. He gained 2 million votes in 2024. Some portion of ~7 million people that voted for Biden voted for trump &/or didn’t show for Harris.

The most likely answer is Harris’ lack of a penis. Trump is 0-1 vs white men and 2-0 vs women. There’s misogyny in the US.
December 19, 2025 at 4:05 AM
You can look these things up instead of wildly speculating.

Voting age population increased 29% between 1992 was and 2024. Voters for the Democratic candidate increased 70%. Population growth doesn’t explain the difference.

www.eac.gov/sites/defaul...

www.census.gov/newsroom/pre...
www.eac.gov
December 19, 2025 at 1:51 AM
Even by his logic . . .

13 X 2 = ~25

25 X 2 = 50

50 X 2 = 100

It’s 300% in base moron.
December 19, 2025 at 12:00 AM
The problem here is you’re trying to substitute your feelings for logic, and those are very different things.
December 18, 2025 at 7:50 PM
That’s ironic, because I can’t argue about how you feel. If you said I want a liberal candidate, I have to say that’s great good luck!

But you didn’t say that. You said Ds lose if they don’t have a liberal candidate. And that’s contradicted by all evidence given your definitions.
December 18, 2025 at 7:50 PM