SleepyPear
@etheriacaprae.bsky.social
Composer from Oregon.
Lover of Bioregions.
Lover of Bioregions.
Political affiliation isn’t listed in DC’s crime statistics.
December 10, 2025 at 6:48 AM
Political affiliation isn’t listed in DC’s crime statistics.
Of of Etsy at some point like 6 years ago, haha
December 10, 2025 at 6:46 AM
Of of Etsy at some point like 6 years ago, haha
Snowgrave speedrun
December 7, 2025 at 4:48 AM
Snowgrave speedrun
“Playing the home game” gives an armed population the advantage having direct access to U.S. infrastructure, and the population isn’t an “other.”
If they want to indiscriminately kill civilians the way you are describing, they’ll manufacture an excuse to do it anyway.
If they want to indiscriminately kill civilians the way you are describing, they’ll manufacture an excuse to do it anyway.
December 1, 2025 at 4:27 AM
“Playing the home game” gives an armed population the advantage having direct access to U.S. infrastructure, and the population isn’t an “other.”
If they want to indiscriminately kill civilians the way you are describing, they’ll manufacture an excuse to do it anyway.
If they want to indiscriminately kill civilians the way you are describing, they’ll manufacture an excuse to do it anyway.
Absolutely! It’s wonderful!
December 1, 2025 at 4:25 AM
Absolutely! It’s wonderful!
(I’ve nearly finished all the tracks originally in the undertale demo)
November 30, 2025 at 7:52 PM
(I’ve nearly finished all the tracks originally in the undertale demo)
They could actually improve it by summarizing the worst parts and hyperlinking the relevant parts of the existing document for each claim.
November 30, 2025 at 7:50 PM
They could actually improve it by summarizing the worst parts and hyperlinking the relevant parts of the existing document for each claim.
The US military still has no definitive solution for guerrilla warfare. The military has been defeated on multiple occasions by people armed with AKs and improvised explosives, just look at instances in Iraq, Afghanistan, Vietnam, etc.
Name change was unrelated.
Name change was unrelated.
November 30, 2025 at 4:59 PM
The US military still has no definitive solution for guerrilla warfare. The military has been defeated on multiple occasions by people armed with AKs and improvised explosives, just look at instances in Iraq, Afghanistan, Vietnam, etc.
Name change was unrelated.
Name change was unrelated.
Do you have an “original” definition you want to present that supposedly the “democrats” have redefined?
Also, Roger Griffin and Umberco Eco weren’t “democrats.” Griffin was a British professor who studied fascist movements, and Eco was an Italian philosopher…
Also, Roger Griffin and Umberco Eco weren’t “democrats.” Griffin was a British professor who studied fascist movements, and Eco was an Italian philosopher…
November 30, 2025 at 4:56 PM
Do you have an “original” definition you want to present that supposedly the “democrats” have redefined?
Also, Roger Griffin and Umberco Eco weren’t “democrats.” Griffin was a British professor who studied fascist movements, and Eco was an Italian philosopher…
Also, Roger Griffin and Umberco Eco weren’t “democrats.” Griffin was a British professor who studied fascist movements, and Eco was an Italian philosopher…
You’re assuming they’d exclusively carry out their oppression with drone strikes and tanks.
November 30, 2025 at 7:53 AM
You’re assuming they’d exclusively carry out their oppression with drone strikes and tanks.
When you say “you don’t know the definition,” it is an admission that you either don’t know, or only know one definition. There are many definitions and ways to identify fascism, all of which serve as a sort of unified diagnosis. There is no workable definition of fascism that doesn’t include MAGA.
November 28, 2025 at 5:52 PM
When you say “you don’t know the definition,” it is an admission that you either don’t know, or only know one definition. There are many definitions and ways to identify fascism, all of which serve as a sort of unified diagnosis. There is no workable definition of fascism that doesn’t include MAGA.
Also if the idea that they’d shoot random Americans is out of consideration, the idea that they’d shoot random American Politicians is also out of consideration by the same justification.
November 28, 2025 at 5:47 PM
Also if the idea that they’d shoot random Americans is out of consideration, the idea that they’d shoot random American Politicians is also out of consideration by the same justification.
Do you think the suggestion is for random members of the national guard to just interpret it differently all unorganized with zero communication? Sheesh.
November 28, 2025 at 5:42 PM
Do you think the suggestion is for random members of the national guard to just interpret it differently all unorganized with zero communication? Sheesh.
MAGA hits all of Umberto Eco’s qualifications for Eternal Fascism.
It additionally qualifies under Roger Griffin’s definition (Palingenetic ultranationalism).
The palingenesis is the rebirth of a “great America.” The xenophobia and ultranationalist intent is also present.
It additionally qualifies under Roger Griffin’s definition (Palingenetic ultranationalism).
The palingenesis is the rebirth of a “great America.” The xenophobia and ultranationalist intent is also present.
November 28, 2025 at 5:39 PM
MAGA hits all of Umberto Eco’s qualifications for Eternal Fascism.
It additionally qualifies under Roger Griffin’s definition (Palingenetic ultranationalism).
The palingenesis is the rebirth of a “great America.” The xenophobia and ultranationalist intent is also present.
It additionally qualifies under Roger Griffin’s definition (Palingenetic ultranationalism).
The palingenesis is the rebirth of a “great America.” The xenophobia and ultranationalist intent is also present.
Exactly. I said she should’ve openly supported it in her campaign, and she dodged talking about it, which is not supporting it.
November 28, 2025 at 8:05 AM
Exactly. I said she should’ve openly supported it in her campaign, and she dodged talking about it, which is not supporting it.
I know. The problem I’m talking about is that Dems agreed to the bill. Trump’s actions are stupid also.
November 28, 2025 at 8:03 AM
I know. The problem I’m talking about is that Dems agreed to the bill. Trump’s actions are stupid also.
True, however advocating for democrats to continue doing this seems like a form of accelerationism, so I sure hope that’s not what your implication is.
November 28, 2025 at 6:42 AM
True, however advocating for democrats to continue doing this seems like a form of accelerationism, so I sure hope that’s not what your implication is.
When did I bring up Trump? I’m saying suddenly democrats started trying to be “stronger on the border” when this is what most of the left opposes,
November 28, 2025 at 6:40 AM
When did I bring up Trump? I’m saying suddenly democrats started trying to be “stronger on the border” when this is what most of the left opposes,
Harris was specifically asked if she believed that trans people should have access to gender affirming care. She said “I believe we should follow the law.” This was during her campaign. So yes, she did discuss this during her campaign.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=iO6Ta86wCDI&t=11m13s
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=iO6Ta86wCDI&t=11m13s
November 28, 2025 at 6:39 AM
Harris was specifically asked if she believed that trans people should have access to gender affirming care. She said “I believe we should follow the law.” This was during her campaign. So yes, she did discuss this during her campaign.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=iO6Ta86wCDI&t=11m13s
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=iO6Ta86wCDI&t=11m13s
The other person is unclear so I’ll try to explain the connection.
Basically, this is a regime openly hostile towards its people, to the point where it has sent the national guard into one of its cities.
Restricting access to firearms for people under armed threat of a fascist regime seems unwise.
Basically, this is a regime openly hostile towards its people, to the point where it has sent the national guard into one of its cities.
Restricting access to firearms for people under armed threat of a fascist regime seems unwise.
November 28, 2025 at 6:34 AM
The other person is unclear so I’ll try to explain the connection.
Basically, this is a regime openly hostile towards its people, to the point where it has sent the national guard into one of its cities.
Restricting access to firearms for people under armed threat of a fascist regime seems unwise.
Basically, this is a regime openly hostile towards its people, to the point where it has sent the national guard into one of its cities.
Restricting access to firearms for people under armed threat of a fascist regime seems unwise.
They’re the fault of a system that perpetuates violence (that both conservatives and liberals uphold)
November 28, 2025 at 6:27 AM
They’re the fault of a system that perpetuates violence (that both conservatives and liberals uphold)
“Storming the White House” does not imply “shoot the politicians in the White House.” It’s not “inciting political violence,” it’s calling for solidarity of the national guard with Americans against a fascist regime.
November 28, 2025 at 6:26 AM
“Storming the White House” does not imply “shoot the politicians in the White House.” It’s not “inciting political violence,” it’s calling for solidarity of the national guard with Americans against a fascist regime.