That’s amazing work – thank you so much, and congrats!

Thanks, it’s very interesting. Re intermediating decisions: what decisions are you thinking about? What means of intermediation (eg what features of platforms)? Really enjoyed the clear and original writing!

For more on this, see @saffron.bsky.social's excellent account here: www.cip.org/blog/predist...

That’s what LLM are made for. Notably ChatGPT’s banana bread is delicious (and we should accept this info as it is, without asking more 😂)

Love this website so much – thanks for sharing!

Here is the post: matteonebbiai.substack.com/p/one-year-l...

Hey @patcon.bsky.social, don’t you think that Polis in practice is not much beyond an opinion mapping tool? The “ongoing group introspection” might happen, but it has to do with the socio-political architecture in which Polis is inserted, not with the tech. But things may change with Polis 2!

I wonder if mission-oriented innovation can be the way. Probably not the right one for many fields that are already highly institutionalized (eg education, health)

What do you see as an alternative? The implementation/landing of innovation often has to rely on existing structures and ways of working (in pillars, in teams)

Yup! This integration of conversation-centered communities is very good. Happy to see more of this practice with shared tooling — possibly with Frankly.org as a mezzo level between wikisurvey and in-person assemblies. @lessig.bsky.social

This is a super cool (and fun!) initiative – thanks!!

Thanks @jamestplunkett.bsky.social! A lot is going on in UK govt on innovation — very excited to see it happening!

That’s very interesting – and important. But we should recognize that public service operate under limited resources, and being able to evaluate the impact per cost matters. Providers are accountable for expenses, hence we should not everlook economic factors – but in a matrix w other dimensions.