I'd like to hear your more scholarly reflection. I don't have the background to be a true critic of the material.

Also, you'll always be a part of the Algol family. #1 person people point to when Algol comes up.

Yeah. It was hyper sensitive to language transmission and other ways that cultural heritage influenced each other. Also dismissing the idea that the current accepted theory is that these classical revolutions happened independently yet simultaneously.

It was super dry but informative. It lays the ground work for the author to insist that Anarchis, Zoaster, Buddha, and Lao Tzu were all Scythians and imported Scythian understanding into those cultures.