Reviewed several ICLR submissions, and I am wondering about the trend: some papers were far outside my area (cost me hours of background reading per review), and others felt low quality. Either the assignment system is random, or the overall bar is going downhill.
PIs: don't submit low-quality work

I’m very happy to share our new paper!

“The Visual Iconicity Challenge: Evaluating Vision–Language Models on Sign Language Form–Meaning Mapping”, co-authored with @asliozyurek.bsky.social, Gerardo Ortega, Kadir Gökgöz, and @esamghaleb.bsky.social

arXiv: arxiv.org/abs/2510.08482

Some amazing @amsterdamnlp.bsky.social people in Vienna💫#acl2025 Raquel Fernández Sandro Pezzelle Katia Shutova @esamghaleb.bsky.social @veraneplenbroek.bsky.social @annabavaresco.bsky.social + @leobertolazzi.bsky.social

@aclmeeting.bsky.social
Can someone please check my post here

Are there people from ARR?

I'm looking for clarification regarding our submission. The editor mentioned that our volunteer reviewer might not meet the qualification requirements.

I deactivated my twitter account. I hope that key figures in our fields and universities move here ….

Who else chooses articles and blogs about scientific topics written before the ChatGTP era?

Hello everyone,
Happy to join this platform and see it thriving!

Is there a codebook on how to connect with more people here?