Thank you so much. The first sentences in the demo sounded terrible. 😬😬😬

Your policy mentions translation and adaptation of common topics. Could you elaborate? What are common topics? What is going to be your policy on using GenAI to translate entries?

If this is not too much to ask for, could you record and share an example of your using your glasses interacting in Spanish-English with another person? As a language teacher, I'm very interested in seeing how it works. Thanks

Yes. This study supports your findings. www.cambridge.org/core/journal...

The total should be to try to reduce the amount of wrong consumed information at all levels 🙂

AI BS is more harmful as individuals receive it as personalized responses, frequently without a broader public discourse on that topic. Also, a broad audience is more likely to identify BS and denounce it. Moreover, you can make experts retract. GenAI will just say "ok, here is your new answer."

But this is from last year, right?

(mis)information you are going to get from CNN or the Economics professor is going to be the same as the (mis)information other people will get. GenAI responses are inconsistent in addition to (sometimes) incorrect. This makes things way more complicated than dealing with the usual misinformation.

I share your fear.

Ayer leí en algún sitio que escribimos para contribuir con un poquito de belleza al mundo.