The argument of liberation by giving up,which contains a similar deficiency to the proposition of collective production-equal sharing at the basis of socialist thought, contradicts human nature in practice. Systems that analyze human nature consider satisfying pleasure by buying as rational behavior

“Liberation by renunciation” appears as a romantic proposition, in line with the lifestyle of the ancient Greek philosopher Diogenes.

Since the process starts from an unequal starting point, wealth continues to be unequally distributed.

The capital class, which holds the production and finance structure in its hands, becomes even richer without any market problems. As the individual buys, capitalist makes a profit. As capitalist produces, the individual is employed.

The conflict seems to have reached equilibrium in our age on the basis of the concept of value individualism in accordance with human nature. The individual, who evaluates purchasing on the basis of pleasure, becomes a property owner through borrowing.

Class distinctions have emerged in the natural course of history. Since the early industrial era, there has been a conflict between the productive capital class and the working class who supply their labor.

In the pursuit of wealth, people become part of the system and enrich the capital class. From this point of view, income inequality needs a definition that is in line with both the basic assumption of the argument put forward from the liberal point of view and the socialist proposition.