Erin Dolan
@erindolan1.bsky.social
Prof of bio ed @universityofga studying how research training and mentoring influence students’ career decisions. She/her.
Website: https://spree.franklinresearch.uga.edu/
Course-based Undergraduate Research enthusiast: https://serc.carleton.edu/curenet/
Website: https://spree.franklinresearch.uga.edu/
Course-based Undergraduate Research enthusiast: https://serc.carleton.edu/curenet/
November 27, 2024 at 8:05 PM
November 27, 2024 at 8:03 PM
Try following @derekbruff.bsky.social @marielpfeifer.bsky.social I’ll recommend others as I find
November 27, 2024 at 8:00 PM
Try following @derekbruff.bsky.social @marielpfeifer.bsky.social I’ll recommend others as I find
Good question! Some and growing I think
November 25, 2024 at 11:49 PM
Good question! Some and growing I think
A second People, Parasites, and Plagues podcast shout out to Mariel Pfeifer for her qualitative characterization of researcher identity!
October 20, 2024 at 12:58 PM
A second People, Parasites, and Plagues podcast shout out to Mariel Pfeifer for her qualitative characterization of researcher identity!
Don't use feedback from a single student about a single mentor to make evaluative judgments about that mentor. Rather, use results from the MURS to identify consistent patterns over time or broader trends to make decisions about how to support mentors to improve. For resources: cimerproject.org
May 22, 2024 at 11:17 AM
Don't use feedback from a single student about a single mentor to make evaluative judgments about that mentor. Rather, use results from the MURS to identify consistent patterns over time or broader trends to make decisions about how to support mentors to improve. For resources: cimerproject.org
Do you direct an undergraduate research program? Consider using the whole MURS or its dimensions to characterize the mentoring experiences of undergraduates in your programs. Then use the results to identify areas of mentoring strength and support mentors in making improvements.
May 22, 2024 at 11:16 AM
Do you direct an undergraduate research program? Consider using the whole MURS or its dimensions to characterize the mentoring experiences of undergraduates in your programs. Then use the results to identify areas of mentoring strength and support mentors in making improvements.
Our paper presents robust evidence regarding the validity of the MURS, showing that sum scores on the MURS and scores on its dimensions can be used to evaluate undergraduate researchers’ mentoring experiences.
May 22, 2024 at 11:15 AM
Our paper presents robust evidence regarding the validity of the MURS, showing that sum scores on the MURS and scores on its dimensions can be used to evaluate undergraduate researchers’ mentoring experiences.
Good news = most ugrads experience positive research mentoring. Bad news = ugrads experience negative mentoring. ⬇️ MURS ~ ⬇️ post-research scientific self-efficacy, scientific identity, research task values, and research career intentions, after controlling for pre-research levels.
May 22, 2024 at 11:15 AM
Good news = most ugrads experience positive research mentoring. Bad news = ugrads experience negative mentoring. ⬇️ MURS ~ ⬇️ post-research scientific self-efficacy, scientific identity, research task values, and research career intentions, after controlling for pre-research levels.
The MURS spans the range of mentoring experienced by undergraduate researchers– from positive mentoring experiences such as technical and psychosocial support to negative experiences with mentors such as mentor inaccessibility and abusive supervision.
May 22, 2024 at 11:13 AM
The MURS spans the range of mentoring experienced by undergraduate researchers– from positive mentoring experiences such as technical and psychosocial support to negative experiences with mentors such as mentor inaccessibility and abusive supervision.