Topotrophic Quantum Relativity
@erikncalloway.bsky.social
The Universe didn't explode; it crystallized. Proposing a unified geometric framework: Gravity = Refraction. Matter = Topology. Dark Matter = Lattice Tension.
Pinned
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18074086👇
Physics is stuck. We have a smooth Container (Relativity) and chunky Content (Quantum). 50 years of forcing them together has failed.
What if the Container IS chunky Content?
Introducing Topotrophic Quantum Relativity (TQR). DOI: doi.org/10.5281/zeno...
What if the Container IS chunky Content?
Introducing Topotrophic Quantum Relativity (TQR). DOI: doi.org/10.5281/zeno...
Look Closer:
There is no "extra mass." There is just stiffening space.
The same mechanism occurs at the largest and smallest scales.
1️⃣Macro: Galaxies spin faster than Newton predicted.
2️⃣Micro: The W-Boson rebounds harder than the standard model allows.
The data isn't wrong. our assumptions are.👇
There is no "extra mass." There is just stiffening space.
The same mechanism occurs at the largest and smallest scales.
1️⃣Macro: Galaxies spin faster than Newton predicted.
2️⃣Micro: The W-Boson rebounds harder than the standard model allows.
The data isn't wrong. our assumptions are.👇
December 30, 2025 at 10:26 AM
Look Closer:
There is no "extra mass." There is just stiffening space.
The same mechanism occurs at the largest and smallest scales.
1️⃣Macro: Galaxies spin faster than Newton predicted.
2️⃣Micro: The W-Boson rebounds harder than the standard model allows.
The data isn't wrong. our assumptions are.👇
There is no "extra mass." There is just stiffening space.
The same mechanism occurs at the largest and smallest scales.
1️⃣Macro: Galaxies spin faster than Newton predicted.
2️⃣Micro: The W-Boson rebounds harder than the standard model allows.
The data isn't wrong. our assumptions are.👇
Critical new data from @StacyMcGaugh.
As I noted in the replies, this 'Steep Decline' in the Milky Way halo is the exact geometric signature TQR predicts for a refractive vacuum.
We don't need Dark Matter to explain this anomaly; we just need to look at the geometry. 👇
As I noted in the replies, this 'Steep Decline' in the Milky Way halo is the exact geometric signature TQR predicts for a refractive vacuum.
We don't need Dark Matter to explain this anomaly; we just need to look at the geometry. 👇
For the referees paper, see Li et al. arxiv.org/abs/2511.17705
December 29, 2025 at 12:42 AM
Critical new data from @StacyMcGaugh.
As I noted in the replies, this 'Steep Decline' in the Milky Way halo is the exact geometric signature TQR predicts for a refractive vacuum.
We don't need Dark Matter to explain this anomaly; we just need to look at the geometry. 👇
As I noted in the replies, this 'Steep Decline' in the Milky Way halo is the exact geometric signature TQR predicts for a refractive vacuum.
We don't need Dark Matter to explain this anomaly; we just need to look at the geometry. 👇
Physics is stuck. We have a smooth Container (Relativity) and chunky Content (Quantum). 50 years of forcing them together has failed.
What if the Container IS chunky Content?
Introducing Topotrophic Quantum Relativity (TQR). DOI: doi.org/10.5281/zeno...
What if the Container IS chunky Content?
Introducing Topotrophic Quantum Relativity (TQR). DOI: doi.org/10.5281/zeno...
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18074086👇
December 28, 2025 at 4:13 PM
Physics is stuck. We have a smooth Container (Relativity) and chunky Content (Quantum). 50 years of forcing them together has failed.
What if the Container IS chunky Content?
Introducing Topotrophic Quantum Relativity (TQR). DOI: doi.org/10.5281/zeno...
What if the Container IS chunky Content?
Introducing Topotrophic Quantum Relativity (TQR). DOI: doi.org/10.5281/zeno...