Reposted by Eric Maltbie
I’ve decided to leave Scientific American after an exciting 4.5 years as editor in chief. I’m going to take some time to think about what comes next (and go birdwatching), but for now I’d like to share a very small sample of the work I’ve been so proud to support (thread)
November 14, 2024 at 7:23 PM
I’ve decided to leave Scientific American after an exciting 4.5 years as editor in chief. I’m going to take some time to think about what comes next (and go birdwatching), but for now I’d like to share a very small sample of the work I’ve been so proud to support (thread)
Personally I think we should simply fund all the science, but given the current environment, “we gotta compete with China” might be useful strategy
www.nature.com/articles/d41...
www.nature.com/articles/d41...
The US is the world’s science superpower — but for how long?
This year's pivotal election will shape the future of US science. Rising international competition and domestic concerns are also at play.
www.nature.com
November 14, 2024 at 12:22 AM
Personally I think we should simply fund all the science, but given the current environment, “we gotta compete with China” might be useful strategy
www.nature.com/articles/d41...
www.nature.com/articles/d41...